Risk Based Pricing A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ

      15. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      16. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      17. Will team members perform Risk based pricing work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      18. How do you hand over Risk based pricing context?

      <--- Score

      19. What are the Risk based pricing use cases?

      <--- Score

      20. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      21. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      22. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      23. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      24. Will team members regularly document their Risk based pricing work?

      <--- Score

      25. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      26. Do you all define Risk based pricing in the same way?

      <--- Score

      27. What is the scope of the Risk based pricing work?

      <--- Score

      28. How would you define Risk based pricing leadership?

      <--- Score

      29. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      30. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      31. What system do you use for gathering Risk based pricing information?

      <--- Score

      32. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      33. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      34. Is there any additional Risk based pricing definition of success?

      <--- Score

      35. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Risk based pricing changes?

      <--- Score

      36. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      37. How does the Risk based pricing manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      38. Is Risk based pricing linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      39. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      40. Has the Risk based pricing work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      41. Is there a clear Risk based pricing case definition?

      <--- Score

      42. What Risk based pricing requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      43. What are the core elements of the Risk based pricing business case?

      <--- Score

      44. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      45. Is the Risk based pricing scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      46. Who approved the Risk based pricing scope?

      <--- Score

      47. Is the Risk based pricing scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      48. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      49. How do you catch Risk based pricing definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      50. Is the scope of Risk based pricing defined?

      <--- Score

      51. Have all basic functions of Risk based pricing been defined?

      <--- Score

      52. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      53. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      54. Are the Risk based pricing requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      55. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      56. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      57. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      58. How have you defined all Risk based pricing requirements first?

      <--- Score

      59. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- СКАЧАТЬ