Название: Critical Process Parameters A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition
Автор: Gerardus Blokdyk
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Зарубежная деловая литература
isbn: 9781867458647
isbn:
10. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
11. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
12. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
13. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
14. What are the record-keeping requirements of Critical Process Parameters activities?
<--- Score
15. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
16. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
17. Who approved the Critical Process Parameters scope?
<--- Score
18. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
19. What are (control) requirements for Critical Process Parameters Information?
<--- Score
20. What is the scope of the Critical Process Parameters work?
<--- Score
21. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
22. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
23. What Critical Process Parameters requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
24. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Critical Process Parameters? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
25. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
26. What would be the goal or target for a Critical Process Parameters’s improvement team?
<--- Score
27. Is Critical Process Parameters required?
<--- Score
28. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
29. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
30. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
31. Do you have a Critical Process Parameters success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
32. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
33. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
34. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
35. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
36. What sources do you use to gather information for a Critical Process Parameters study?
<--- Score
37. What is the scope of the Critical Process Parameters effort?
<--- Score
38. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
39. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
40. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
41. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
42. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
43. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
44. When is/was the Critical Process Parameters start date?
<--- Score
45. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
46. Is the scope of Critical Process Parameters defined?
<--- Score
47. Have all basic functions of Critical Process Parameters been defined?
<--- Score
48. What is the context?
<--- Score
49. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
50. Is there any additional Critical Process Parameters definition of success?
<--- Score
51. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
52. How would you define Critical Process Parameters leadership?
<--- Score
53. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
54. Is the Critical Process Parameters scope СКАЧАТЬ