Название: Service Networking A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition
Автор: Gerardus Blokdyk
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Зарубежная деловая литература
isbn: 9781867461838
isbn:
12. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
13. What is the scope?
<--- Score
14. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
15. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Service networking goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
16. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
17. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
18. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
19. Are the Service networking requirements testable?
<--- Score
20. Are accountability and ownership for Service networking clearly defined?
<--- Score
21. Have all basic functions of Service networking been defined?
<--- Score
22. Is Service networking linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
23. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
24. What would be the goal or target for a Service networking’s improvement team?
<--- Score
25. What is the context?
<--- Score
26. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
27. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
28. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
29. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
30. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
31. When is/was the Service networking start date?
<--- Score
32. Is there a critical path to deliver Service networking results?
<--- Score
33. What was the context?
<--- Score
34. What sources do you use to gather information for a Service networking study?
<--- Score
35. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
36. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
37. Has the Service networking work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
38. How are consistent Service networking definitions important?
<--- Score
39. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
40. Who are the Service networking improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
41. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
42. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Service networking?
<--- Score
43. How do you hand over Service networking context?
<--- Score
44. Are the Service networking requirements complete?
<--- Score
45. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
46. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
47. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
48. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
49. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
50. Is special Service networking user knowledge required?
<--- Score
51. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
52. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
53. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
54. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
55. What is the scope of the СКАЧАТЬ