Liquid Biofuels. Группа авторов

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ and chemicals: A review, Bioresource Technology Reports, 7, 100279, 2019.

      113. Doku, A., Falco, S., Biofuels in developing countries: Are comparative advantages enough?, Energy Policy, 44, 101-117, 2012.

      114. Padilla-Rivera, A., Paredes, M.G., Güereca, L.P., A systematic review of the sustainability assessment of bioenergy: The case of gaseous biofuels, Biomass and Bioenergy, 125, 79-94, 2019.

115. Carneiro, M.L.N.M., Pradelle, F., Braga, S.L., Gomes, M.S.P., Martins, A.R.F.A., Turkovics, F., Pradelle, R.N.C., Potential of biofuels from algae: Comparison with fossil fuels, ethanol and biodiesel in Europe and Brazil through life cycle assessment (LCA), Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 73: 632-653, 2017.

      116. Mofijur, M., Rasul, M.G., Hyde, J., Azad, A.K., Mamat, R., Bhuiya, M.M.K., Role of biofuel and their binary (diesel–biodiesel) and ternary (ethanol–biodiesel–diesel) blends on internal combustion engines emission reduction, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53: 265-278, 2016.

      117. Adewuyi, A., Challenges and prospects of renewable energy in Nigeria: A case of bioethanol and biodiesel production, Energy Reports, 6, 4, 77-88, 2020.

      118. Tan, I.S., Lam, M.K., Foo, H.C.Y., Lim, S., Lee, K.T., Advances of macroalgae biomass for the third generation of bioethanol production, Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 28, 2, 502-517, 2020.

      119. Ayodele, B.V., Alsaffar, M.A., Mustapa, S.I., An overview of integration opportunities for sustainable bioethanol production from first- and second-generation sugar-based feedstocks, Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118857, 2020.

      120. Zhu, L., Yan, C., Li, Z., Microalgal cultivation with biogas slurry for biofuel production, Bioresource Technology, 220, 629-636, 2016.

      121. Xue, S., Song, J., Wang, X., Shang, Z., Sheng, C., Li, C., Zhu, Y., Liu, J. A systematic comparison of biogas development and related policies between China and Europe and corresponding insights, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 117, 109474, 2020.

      122. Achinas, S., Jan, G., Euverink, W., Rambling facets of manure-based biogas production in Europe: A briefing, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 119, 109566, 2020.

      123. Zabed, H.M., Akter, S., Yun, J., Zhang, G., Awad, F.N., Qi, X., Sabu, J.N., Recent advances in biological pretreatment of microalgae and lignocellulosic biomass for biofuel production, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 105, 105-128, 2019.

      124. Stamenkovic, O.S., Siliveru, K., Velijkovic, V.B., Bankovic-Ilic, I.B., Tasic, M.B., Ciampitti, I.A., Dalovic, I.G., Mitrovic, P.M., Sikora, V.S., Prasad, P.V.V., Production of biofuels from sorghum, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 124, 109769, 2020.

      125. Vasquez, M.C., Silva, E.E., Castillo, E.F., Hydrotreatment of vegetable oils: A review of the technologies and its developments for jet biofuel production, Biomass and Bioenergy, 105, 197-206, 2017.

      126. Wirth, R., Lakatos, G., Böjti, T., Maroti, G., Bagi, Z., Rakhely, G., Kovacs, K.L., Anaerobic gaseous biofuel production using microalgal biomass – A review, Anaerobe, 52, 1-8, 2018.

127. Zabed, H.M., Akter, S., Yun, J., Zhang, G., Qi, X., Biogas from microalgae: Technologies, challenges and opportunities, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 117, 109503, 2020.

      128. Siquire, J.G.W.S., Rodrigues, C., Vanderberghe, L.P.S., Woiciechowski, A.L., Soccol, C.R., Current advances in on site cellulose production and application on lignocellulosic biomass conversion to biofuels; A review, Biomass and Bioenergy, 132, 105419, 2020.

      ^*Corresponding author: [email protected]

2

      Advancements of Cavitation Technology in Biodiesel Production – from Fundamental Concept to Commercial Scale-Up

       Ritesh S. Malani1, Vijayanand S. Moholkar2, Nimir O. Elbashir3 and Hanif A. Choudhury3*

       1Department of Petrochemical and Energy Engineering, Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai – IndianOil Odisha Campus, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

       2Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, India

       3Chemical Engineering Program, Texas A&M University at Qatar, Education City, Doha Qatar

       Abstract

Renewable energy and fuels have gained significant attention over the last two decades, with a remarkable increase in their production. Among the renewable fuels, biodiesel has emerged as a promising alternative to mineral diesel due to its performance characteristics in the diesel engine. To meet future demands, the production of biodiesel must be efficient in terms of energy, cost, and processing time. As the process involves the two immiscible phases, adequate mixing is necessary to produce appropriate intermixing between the reactants. The application of the heterogeneous catalyst further augments the mass transfer barrier in the reaction system. The conventional methods are insufficient to increase biodiesel production at the demanded rate. The application of ultrasound for the transesterification process opens new opportunities for researchers and engineers to fulfil the future renewable energy demand. The cavitation process in the reaction mixture will help reduce the surface tension between the reactants, improves their intermixing to form a fine emulsion. The present book chapter will emphasize the fundamental aspects of the cavitation phenomenon and its role in process intensification. The advancement in designing and developing the cavitational process for large scale biodiesel production has been explored and analyzed in terms of fundamental concepts.

      Keyword: Biodiesel, transesterification, ultrasound, hydrodynamic cavitation, reactor design, process scale-up

2.1 Introduction

Demand for energy, mostly in terms of transportation fuel and electricity, has increased remarkably over the last few decades and will continue to grow in the future with the rising population [1, 2]. The major energy demand is fulfilled by fossil fuels such as coal, crude oil, and natural gas. Because of the limited reservoirs of conventional fossil fuels, their dwindling prices and environmental concerns, the research community has been compelled to look for alternative energy sources for sustainable development of human society. Researchers have explored several alternatives to fossil-based energy sources to fulfil the demand for electricity and transportation fuel. Among these, biodiesel has become a promising alternative to conventional diesel; it can be used in the existing diesel engine with minor alterations [3]. Using biodiesel in a diesel engine either in blended or in the pure form will reduce the detrimental effect of toxic gases on the environment [4]. Use of biodiesel can also support the sustainable development in rural areas by creating agricultural employments and a sustainable energy security for countries that are highly dependent on crude oil imports [5]. Biodiesel, being a renewable fuel, has several advantages over conventional diesel, such as higher lubricity, superior cetane number with improved combustion efficiency, reduced emission of aromatics, higher flash point, etc. [6, 7]. Technically, biodiesel is a mixture of mono-alkyl methyl esters obtained from the reaction of short-chain alcohols and triglycerides or free fatty acids [8]. Conventionally, biodiesel is prepared from vegetable oils (mostly edible only); however, the increase in demand for energy due to population growth and debate on food security over fuel supply has led to a search СКАЧАТЬ