Название: Manual de goniometría
Автор: Cynthia C. Norkin
Издательство: Bookwire
Жанр: Медицина
Серия: Terapia Manual
isbn: 9788499109114
isbn:
8. Gogia, PP, et al: Reliability and validity of goniometric measurements at the knee. Phys Ther 67:192, 1987.
9. Enwemeka, CS: Radiographic verification of knee goniometry. Scand J Rehabil Med 18:47, 1986.
10. Ahlback, SO y Lindahl, O: Sagittal mobility of the hip-joint. Acta Orthop Scand 34:310, 1964.
11. Kato, M, et al: The accuracy of goniometric measurements of proximal interphalangeal joints in fresh cadavers: Comparison between methods of measurement, types of goniometers, and fingers. J Hand Ther 20:12, 2007.
12. Chen, J, et al: Meta-analysis of normative cervical motion. Spine 24:1571, 1999.
13. Herrmann, DB: Validity study of head and neck flexion-extension motion comparing measurements of a pendulum goniometer and roentgenograms. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 11:414, 1990.
14. Ordway, NR, et al: Cervical sagittal range-of-motion analysis using three methods: Cervical range-of-motion device, space, and radiography. Spine 22:501, 1997.
15. Tousignant, M, et al: Criterion validity of the cervical range of motion (CROM) goniometer for cervical flexion and extension. Spine 25:324, 2000.
16. Tousignant, M, et al: Criterion validity of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for rotational range of motion on healthy adults. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 35:242, 2006.
17. Macrae, JF y Wright, V: Measurement of back movement. Ann Rheum Dis 28:584, 1969.
18. Portek, I, et al: Correlation between radiographic and clinical measurement of lumbar spine movement. Br J Rheumatol 22:197, 1983.
19. Burdett, RG, Brown, KE y Fall, MP: Reliability and validity of four instruments for measuring lumbar spine and pelvic positions. Phys Ther 66:677, 1986.
20. Mayer, TG, et al: Use of noninvasive techniques for quantification of spinal range-of-motion in normal subjects and chronic low-back dysfunction patients. Spine 9:588, 1984.
21. Saur, PM, et al: Lumbar range of motion: Reliability and validity of the inclinometer technique in the clinical measurement of trunk flexibility. Spine 21:1332, 1996.
22. Samo, DG, et al: Validity of three lumbar sagittal motion measurement methods: Surface inclinometers compared with radiographs. J Occup Environ Med 39:209, 1997.
23. Vasen, AP, et al: Functional range of motion of the elbow. J Hand Surg Br 20A:288, 1995.
24. Cooper, JE, et al: Elbow joint restriction: Effect on functional upper limb motion during performance of three feeding activities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:805, 1993.
25. Nelson, DL: Functional wrist motion. Hand Clin 13:83, 1997.
26. Hermann, KM y Reese, CS: Relationships among selected measures of impairment, functional limitation, and disability in patients with cervical spine disorder. Phys Ther 81:903, 2001.
27. Triffitt, PD: The relationship between motion of the shoulder and the stated ability to perform activities of daily living. J Bone Joint Surg 80:41, 1998.
28. Wagner, MB, et al: Assessment of hand function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:801, 1993.
29. Waddell, G, et al: Objective clinical evaluation of physical impairment in chronic low back pain. Spine 17:617, 1992.
30. World Health Organization: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). World Health Organization, Ginebra, 2001.
31. Scalzitti, DA: Examination of Function. En: O’Sullivan, SB, Schmitz, TJ y Fulk, GD (eds): Physical Rehabilitation, 6.a ed. FA Davis, Filadelfia, 2014.
32. Moore, ML: Clinical Assessment of Joint Motion. En: Basmajian, JV (ed): Therapeutic Exercise, 3.a ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1978.
33. Miller, PJ: Assessment of Joint Motion. En: Rothstein, JM (ed): Measurement in Physical Therapy. Churchill Livingstone, Nueva York, 1985.
34. Lea, RD y Gerhardt, JJ: Current concepts review: Range-of-motion measurements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:784, 1995.
35. Williams, MA, et al: A systematic review of reliability and validity studies of methods for measuring active and passive cervical range of motion. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 33:138, 2010.
36. Van de Pol, R, et al: Inter-rater reliability for measurement of passive physiological range of motion of upper extremity joints is better if instruments are used: A systematic review. J Physiother 56:7, 2010.
37. Van Trijffel E, et al: Inter-rater reliability for measurement of passive physiological movements in lower extremity joints is generally low: A systematic review. J Physiother 56:223, 2010.
38. Grohmann, JE: Comparison of two methods of goniometry. Phys Ther 63:922, 1983.
39. Hamilton, GF y Lachenbruch, PA: Reliability of goniometers in assessing finger joint angle. Phys Ther 49:465, 1969.
40. Boone, DC, et al: Reliability of goniometric measurements. Phys Ther 58:1355, 1978.
41. Pandya, S, et al: Reliability of goniometric measurements in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Phys Ther 65:1339, 1985.
42. Bovens, AM, et al: Variability and reliability of joint measurements. Am J Sport Med 18:58, 1990.
43. Hellebrandt, FA, Duvall, EN y Moore, ML: The measurement of joint motion. Part III: Reliability of goniometry. Phys Ther Rev 29:302, 1949.
44. Low, JL: The reliability of joint measurement. Physiotherapy 62:227, 1976.
45. Greene, BL y Wolf, SL: Upper extremity joint movement: Comparison of two measurement devices. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 70:299, 1989.
46. Tucci, SM, et al: Cervical motion assessment: A new, simple and accurate method. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 67:225, 1986.
47. Youdas, JW, Carey, JR y Garrett, TR: Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion: Comparison of three methods. Phys Ther 71:2, 1991.
48. Fitzgerald, GK, et al: Objective assessment with establishment of normal values for lumbar spine range of motion. Phys Ther 63:1776, 1983.
49. Nitschke, JE, et al: Reliability of the American Medical Association Guides’ model for measuring spinal range of motion. Spine 24:262, 1999.
50. Mayerson, NH y Milano, RA: Goniometric measurement reliability in physical medicine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 65:92, 1984.
51. Watkins, MA, et al: Reliability of goniometric measurements and visual estimates of knee range of motion obtained in a clinical setting. Phys Ther 71:90, 1991.
52. СКАЧАТЬ