Название: Capability Security A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition
Автор: Gerardus Blokdyk
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Зарубежная деловая литература
isbn: 9781867458791
isbn:
105. When is/was the Capability security start date?
<--- Score
106. How will the Capability security team and the group measure complete success of Capability security?
<--- Score
107. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
108. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
109. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
110. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
111. Who approved the Capability security scope?
<--- Score
112. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
113. What are (control) requirements for Capability security Information?
<--- Score
114. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
115. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
116. Are the Capability security requirements complete?
<--- Score
117. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
118. Is there a critical path to deliver Capability security results?
<--- Score
119. Has a Capability security requirement not been met?
<--- Score
120. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
121. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
122. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
123. Is there a Capability security management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
124. Is the Capability security scope manageable?
<--- Score
125. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
126. Are team charters developed?
<--- Score
127. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
128. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
129. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
130. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
131. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
132. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
133. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Capability security results are met?
<--- Score
134. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
135. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
136. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
137. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
138. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
139. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Capability security work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
140. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Capability security?
<--- Score
141. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Capability security Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
СКАЧАТЬ