Capability Security A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Capability Security A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk страница 8

СКАЧАТЬ

      105. When is/was the Capability security start date?

      <--- Score

      106. How will the Capability security team and the group measure complete success of Capability security?

      <--- Score

      107. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      108. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?

      <--- Score

      109. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      110. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      111. Who approved the Capability security scope?

      <--- Score

      112. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      113. What are (control) requirements for Capability security Information?

      <--- Score

      114. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      115. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      116. Are the Capability security requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      117. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      118. Is there a critical path to deliver Capability security results?

      <--- Score

      119. Has a Capability security requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      120. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      121. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      122. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      123. Is there a Capability security management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      124. Is the Capability security scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      125. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      126. Are team charters developed?

      <--- Score

      127. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      128. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      129. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      130. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?

      <--- Score

      131. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      132. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      133. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Capability security results are met?

      <--- Score

      134. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      135. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      136. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      137. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      138. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      139. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Capability security work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      140. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Capability security?

      <--- Score

      141. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Capability security Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

      INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?

      <--- Score

СКАЧАТЬ