Название: Capability Security A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition
Автор: Gerardus Blokdyk
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Зарубежная деловая литература
isbn: 9781867458791
isbn:
<--- Score
17. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
18. What happens if Capability security’s scope changes?
<--- Score
19. What are the record-keeping requirements of Capability security activities?
<--- Score
20. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
21. Has the Capability security work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
22. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
23. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
24. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
25. What gets examined?
<--- Score
26. How can the value of Capability security be defined?
<--- Score
27. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
28. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
29. Do you all define Capability security in the same way?
<--- Score
30. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
31. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
32. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
33. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
34. What are the core elements of the Capability security business case?
<--- Score
35. What was the context?
<--- Score
36. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
37. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
38. What would be the goal or target for a Capability security’s improvement team?
<--- Score
39. What are the Capability security use cases?
<--- Score
40. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
41. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Capability security changes?
<--- Score
42. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
43. What is the scope of Capability security?
<--- Score
44. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
45. What system do you use for gathering Capability security information?
<--- Score
46. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
47. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
48. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
49. Are the Capability security requirements testable?
<--- Score
50. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
51. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
52. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
53. Who are the Capability security improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
54. Will team members regularly document their Capability security work?
<--- Score
55. What are the Capability security tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
56. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Capability security? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
57. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
58. Is Capability security linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
59. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
60. What are the requirements for audit information?
СКАЧАТЬ