Continuous Planning A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Continuous Planning A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk страница 7

СКАЧАТЬ inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      60. What system do you use for gathering Continuous Planning information?

      <--- Score

      61. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      62. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      63. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      64. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      65. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      66. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      67. What are the core elements of the Continuous Planning business case?

      <--- Score

      68. How do you manage changes in Continuous Planning requirements?

      <--- Score

      69. Is Continuous Planning linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      70. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      71. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      72. Who are the Continuous Planning improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      73. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      74. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      75. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      76. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      77. When is/was the Continuous Planning start date?

      <--- Score

      78. Is there a clear Continuous Planning case definition?

      <--- Score

      79. How have you defined all Continuous Planning requirements first?

      <--- Score

      80. Is Continuous Planning required?

      <--- Score

      81. What Continuous Planning requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      82. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      83. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      84. Will team members regularly document their Continuous Planning work?

      <--- Score

      85. Do you all define Continuous Planning in the same way?

      <--- Score

      86. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      87. What happens if Continuous Planning’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      88. How would you define Continuous Planning leadership?

      <--- Score

      89. Will team members perform Continuous Planning work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      90. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      91. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Continuous Planning results are met?

      <--- Score

      92. What is the scope of Continuous Planning?

      <--- Score

      93. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      94. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

      <--- Score

      95. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      96. How do you manage unclear Continuous Planning requirements?

      <--- Score

      97. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      98. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      99. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      100. Has the Continuous Planning work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      101. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      102. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      103. СКАЧАТЬ