Medical Scoring A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ Score

      76. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?

      <--- Score

      77. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?

      <--- Score

      78. Are there any revenue recognition issues?

      <--- Score

      79. How do you assess your Medical scoring workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?

      <--- Score

      80. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?

      <--- Score

      81. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?

      <--- Score

      82. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?

      <--- Score

      83. How are the Medical scoring’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?

      <--- Score

      84. Is the quality assurance team identified?

      <--- Score

      85. Who needs budgets?

      <--- Score

      86. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?

      <--- Score

      87. How many trainings, in total, are needed?

      <--- Score

      88. Think about the people you identified for your Medical scoring project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?

      <--- Score

      89. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?

      <--- Score

      90. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?

      <--- Score

      91. Who needs what information?

      <--- Score

      92. What Medical scoring problem should be solved?

      <--- Score

      93. What are the Medical scoring resources needed?

      <--- Score

      94. What else needs to be measured?

      <--- Score

      95. How do you recognize an Medical scoring objection?

      <--- Score

      96. Are there Medical scoring problems defined?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Medical scoring Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

      INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      2. Are accountability and ownership for Medical scoring clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      3. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Medical scoring leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      4. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      5. How does the Medical scoring manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      6. What is the scope of the Medical scoring work?

      <--- Score

      7. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      8. What sources do you use to gather information for a Medical scoring study?

      <--- Score

      9. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      10. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      11. Has a Medical scoring requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      12. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      13. Have all basic functions of Medical scoring been defined?

      <--- Score

      14. Are the Medical scoring requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      15. Who is gathering Medical scoring information?

      <--- Score

      16. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      17. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- СКАЧАТЬ