СКАЧАТЬ
x Superscript minus 2 Baseline left-parenthesis bold x Subscript k minus n Sub Subscript x Subscript plus 2 Baseline comma bold u Subscript k minus n Sub Subscript x Subscript plus 2 colon k Baseline right-parenthesis right-parenthesis 3rd Row vertical-ellipsis 4th Row bold g left-parenthesis bold upper F squared left-parenthesis bold x Subscript k minus 2 Baseline comma bold u Subscript k minus 2 colon k Baseline right-parenthesis right-parenthesis 5th Row bold g left-parenthesis bold upper F left-parenthesis bold x Subscript k minus 1 Baseline comma bold u Subscript k minus 1 colon k Baseline right-parenthesis right-parenthesis 6th Row bold g left-parenthesis bold x Subscript k Baseline comma bold u Subscript k Baseline right-parenthesis EndMatrix period"/>
Defining
(3.13)
the filtered state estimate is computed from the following discrete‐time system [9]:
(3.14)
(3.15)
where is the observer gain, , and is the discrete nonlinear observability matrix, which is computed at sample time as:
(3.16)
The observer gain is determined in a way to guarantee local stability of the perturbed linear system for the reconstruction error in :
(3.17)
where and
This approach for designing nonlinear observers is applicable to systems that are observable for every bounded input, , with and being uniformly Lipschitz continuous functions of the state:
(3.18)
(3.19)
where and denote the corresponding Lipschitz constants. However, convergence is guaranteed only for a neighborhood around the true state [36].
3.4 Sliding‐Mode Observer
The equivalent control approach allows for designing the discrete‐time sliding‐mode realization of a reduced‐order asymptotic observer [37]. Let us consider the following discrete‐time state‐space model: