Computational Modeling and Simulation Examples in Bioengineering. Группа авторов

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ Formaggia, L., Lamponi, D., and Quarteroni, A. One‐dimensional models for blood flow in arteries. J. Eng. Math. 47 (3–4): 251–276.

      56 56 Nobile, F. and Vergara, C. (2008). An effective fluid–structure interaction formulation for vascular dynamics by generalized Robin conditions. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 30 (2): 731–763.

      57 57 Causin, P., Gerbeau, J.F., and Nobile, F. (2005). Added‐mass effect in the design of partitioned algorithms for fluid–structure problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 194 (42–44): 4506–4527.

      58 58 Čanić, S., Mikelić, A., and Tambača, J. (2005). A two‐dimensional effective model describing fluid–structure interaction in blood flow: analysis, simulation and experimental validation. Comptes Rendus. 333 (12): 867–883.

      59 59 Čanić, S., Tambača, J., Guidoboni, G. et al. (2006). Modeling viscoelastic behavior of arterial walls and their interaction with pulsatile blood flow. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 67 (1): 164–193.

      60 60 Čanić, S., Hartley, C.J., Rosenstrauch, D. et al. (2006). Blood flow in compliant arteries: an effective viscoelastic reduced model, numerics, and experimental validation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 34 (4): 575–575.

      61 61 Heil, A., Hazel, L., and Boyle, J. (2008). Solvers for large‐displacement fluid–structure interaction problems: segregated versus monolithic approaches. Comput. Mech. 43 (1): 91–101.

      62 62 MacSweeney, S.T.R., Powell, J.T., and Greenhalgh, R.M. (1994). Pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br. J. Surg. 81: 935–941.

      63 63 van't Veer, M., Buth, J., Merkx, M. et al. (2008). Biomechanical properties of abdominal aortic aneurysms assessed by simultaneously measured pressure and volume changes in humans. J. Vasc. Surg. 48 (6): 1401–1407.

      64 64 Ganten, M.K., Krautter, U., von Tengg‐Kobligk, H. et al. (2008). Quantification of aortic distensibility in abdominal aortic aneurysm using ecg‐gated multi‐detector computed tomography. Vasc. Intervent. 18 (5): 966–973.

      65 65 Molacek, J., Baxa, J., Houdek, K. et al. (2011). Assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall distensibility with electrocardiography‐gated computed tomography. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 25 (8): 1036–1042.

      66 66 Di Puccio, F., Celi, S., and Forte, P. (2012). Review of experimental investigations on compressibility of arteries and the introduction of a new apparatus. Exp. Mech. 52 (7): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340‐012‐9614‐4.

      67 67 Humphrey, J.D. and Yin, F.C. (1987). A new constitutive formulation for characterizing the mechanical behavior of soft tissues. Biophys. J. 52 (4): 563–570.

      68 68 Ogden, R.W. (2009). Anisotropy and nonlinear elasticity in arterial wall mechanics. In: Biomechanical Modelling at the Molecular, Cellular and Tissue Levels. CISM Courses and Lectures, vol. 508 (eds. G.A. Holzapfel, R.W. Ogden, F. Pfeiffer, et al.), 179–258. Vienna: Springer.

      69 69 Vande Geest, J.P., Sacks, M.S., and Vorp, D.A. (2004). Age dependency of the biaxial biomechanical behavior of human abdominal aorta. J. Biomech. Eng. 12: 815–822.

      70 70 Vande Geest, J.P., Sacks, M.S., and Vorp, D.A. (2006). The effects of aneurysm on the biaxial mechanical behavior of human abdominal aorta. J. Biomech. 39: 1324–1334.

      71 71 Koncar, I., Nikolic, D., Pantovic, S. et al. (2013). Modeling of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture by using bubble inflation test. Bioinform. Bioeng. (BIBE) https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBE.2013.6701612.

      72 72 Vande Geest, J.P., Di Martino, E.S., Bohra, A. et al. (2006). A biomechanics‐based rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm risk assessment. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1085: 11–21.

      73 73 Thubrikar, M.J., Labrosse, M., Robicsek, F. et al. (2001). Mechanical properties of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall. J. Med. Eng. Techn. 25 (4): 133–142.

      74 74 Stamatopoulos, C., Mathioulakis, D.S., Papaharilaou, Y., and Katsamouris, A. (2011). Experimental unsteady flow study in a patientspecific abdominal aortic aneurysm model. Exp. Fluids 50 (6): 1695–1709.

      75 75 Holzapfel, G.A. (2006). Determination of material models for arterial walls from uniaxial extension tests and histological structure. J. Theor. Biol. 238 (2): 290–302.

      76 76 Simsek, F.G. and Kwon, Y.W. (2015). Investigation of material modeling in fluid–structure interaction analysis of an idealized three layered abdominal aorta: aneurysm initiation and fully developed aneurysms. J. Biol. Phys. 41 (2): 173–201.

      77 77 Taghizadeh, H., Tafazzoli‐Shadpour, M., Shadmehr, M., and Fatouraee, N. (2015). Evaluation of biaxial mechanical properties of aortic media based on the lamellar microstructure. Materials 8 (1): 302–316.

      78 78 Sokolis, D.P., Kefaloyannis, E.M., Kouloukoussa, M. et al. (2006). A structural basis for the aortic stress–strain relation in uniaxial tension. J. Biomech. 39 (9): 1651–1662.

      79 79 Karimi, A., Navidbakhsh, M., Shojaei, A., and Faghihi, S. (2013). Measurement of the uniaxial mechanical properties of healthy and atherosclerotic human coronary arteries. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 33 (5): 2550–2554.

      80 80 Taylor, C.A. and Humphrey, J.D. (2009). Open problems in computational vascular biomechanics: hemodynamics and arterial wall mechanics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 198 (45–46): 3514–3523.

      81 81 Raut, S.S., Chandra, S., Shum, J., and Finol, E.A. (2013). The role of geometric and biomechanical factors in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk assessment. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 41 (7): 1459–1477.

      82 82 Stenbaek, J., Kalin, B., and Swedenborg, J. (2000). Growth of thrombus may be a better predictor of rupture than diameter in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 20 (5): 466–469.

      83 83 Li, Z.‐Y., U‐King‐Im, J., Tang, T.Y. et al. (2008). Impact of calcification and intraluminal thrombus on the computed wall stresses of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J. Vasc. Surg. 47 (5): 928–936.

      84 84 Di Martino, E.S. and Vorp, D.A. (2003). Effect of variation in intraluminal thrombus constitutive properties on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 31 (7): 804–809.

      85 85 O'Leary, S.A., Kavanagh, E.G., Grace, P.A. et al. (2014). The biaxial mechanical behaviour of abdominal aortic aneurysm intraluminal thrombus: classification of morphology and the determination of layer and region specific properties. J. Biomech. 47 (6): 1430–1437.

      86 86 Tong, J., Schriefl, A.J., Cohnert, T., and Holzapfel, G.A. (2013). Gender differences in biomechanical properties, thrombus age, mass fraction and clinical factors of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 45 (4): 364–372.

      87 87 Speelman, L., Bosboom, E.M.H., Schurink, G.W.H. et al. (2008). Patient‐specific AAA wall stress analysis: 99‐percentile versus peak stress. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 36: 668–676.

      88 88 Speelman, L., Bosboom, E.M.H., Schurink, G.W.H., Jacobs, M.J.H.M., and van de Vosse, F.N. (2008). AAA Growth Predicted with Wall Stress. Poster Session Presented at Conference. Mate Poster Award 2008: 13th Annual Poster Contest.

      89 89 Speelman, L., Hellenthal, F.A., Pulinx, B. et al. (2010). The influence of wall stress on AAA growth and biomarkers. Eur. J. Vasc. Surg. 39: 410–416.

      90 90 Kontopodis, N., Metaxa, E., Papaharilaou, Y. et al. (2013). Changes in geometric configuration СКАЧАТЬ