Overall Equipment Effectiveness. Robert Hansen C.
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Overall Equipment Effectiveness - Robert Hansen C. страница 10

Название: Overall Equipment Effectiveness

Автор: Robert Hansen C.

Издательство: Ingram

Жанр: Здоровье

Серия:

isbn: 9780831191153

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ other areas of the plant should not only be informed of the key equipment OEE goals. They should also be supportive of the prioritized list and serve the key assets accordingly (Subordinate).

      4.The selected bottleneck area should incorporate all necessary changes for high OEE (Elevate).

      5.When this area is successful, the next prioritized key asset should implement the new methods, insuring that the greatest benefits are achieved quickly (Go Back).

      Many companies have achieved tremendous improvement by launching such a strategy, including Reynolds Metals Company, as outlined in the June 1998 issue of Reliability magazine8. Reynolds Metals embraced a new process it called “Total Productive Manufacturing.” This process refocused its manufacturing at the plant level, from “Mission/Vision” all the way to best practices on the shop floor. Measuring its own progress was a vital part of the process of change. The backbone of these measures was OEE improvement.

       *The word ‘factory’ can be replaced by ‘refinery’ throughout this book.

       References:

      1. Nakajima, Seiichi. Introduction to TPM: Total Productive Maintenance. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Productivity Press, 1988.

      2. Allen, F. “How Do You Make Paper Clips?.” American Heritage of Invention & Technology, Volume 14/number 1, (1998): page 6.

      3. Pray, Tom. “Decide II Simulation: A Full-enterprise Business Simulation.Tom Pray,” Rochester Institute of Technology, New York (1999).

      4. Shingo, Shigeo. A Revolution in Manufacturing: The SMED System, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Productivity Press, 1985.

      5. Moubray, John. Reliability-centered Maintenance. 2nd Edition, New York, New York: Industrial Press, 1997.

      6. Cox III, J., Spencer, M. The Constraints Management Handbook. Boca Raton, Florida: The St. Lucie Press, 1998.

      7. Goldratt, Eli. Critical Chain. Great Barrington, Massachusetts: The North River Press, 1997.

      8. Holt, F., E. Myers, R. Underwood, and others. “Building and Sustaining Total Productive Manufacturing At Reynolds Metals Company.” Reliability Magazine Volume 5 Issue 2, (June 1998): pages 4-12.

       LEARNING THE BASICS OF OEE METRICS

      This chapter introduces definitions of OEE categories, a sample production report, summary results with OEE calculations, and a reconciliation of the various OEE results and losses. The categories that follow are suggested as a basic set for nearly every key manufacturing area. The purpose of the categories is to provide enough detail to focus priorities and reveal areas of major opportunity. All events must be categorized without using categories such as “miscellaneous” or “other.” At the same time, the categories should not be so detailed that they are overwhelmed by too much incremental information. Larger processes should accumulate information for each key step.

      The categories should allow the company to identify its opportunities in a reasonable time frame. They should also form the baseline for detailed analysis. Using common categories enables a company to benchmark similar areas both internally and externally. To be successful at benchmarking, all events must be categorized; total reconciliation is then supported and credibility is maintained. More discussion on benchmarking can be found in section 8.10.

      A sample product report of the important categories follows in section 2.3. This report, which covers a production period of 40 hours, looks at a full range of problems and includes a log sheet that categorizes the various events. A suggested report is attached along with the TPM (Nakajima) OEE formulas1 and three methods of computing OEE. Regardless of the approach used, the OEE and various Loss percentages should total 100 percent.

       Key Definitions:

      imageAsset Utilization. The percent of Total (calendar) Time that the equipment runs.

      imageDowntime (DT). All Unplanned Machine downtime events should be categorized into the following categories:

      imageDT Technical. Downtime due to any equipment failures affecting the machine or process, including periphery equipment, (utilities, sprinklers, doors, humidifiers etc.), equipment failure due to maintenance errors, and equipment-caused dirt or scratches.

      imageDT Operational. Downtime caused by not following procedures, operating outside of specifications, operator error, etc.

      imageDT Quality. Downtime caused by nonconforming supplies and raw materials, process control problems, unplanned testing, non-manufacturable product, and dirt from the product or process.

      imageExcluded Time. This is (normally) planned time not scheduled for production. This would be scheduled maintenance downtimes (preventative maintenance and shutdowns planned at least a week in advance), scheduled meetings, experiment time (if the product is not going to be sold), planned training (if no product is made), Headroom time such as Holidays/Sundays/weekends, and “no product scheduled”. It should also include unplanned time when completing orders early due to good performance. Good performance should not be detrimental to OEE.

      imageIdeal Cycle Time or Theoretical Rate. Also called Ideal Speed Rate. The best rate of speed or cycle time for key equipment or the flow line bottleneck, given a size and format of product. For example, key equipment or a flow line bottleneck is designed and accredited for 17 sec cycle time, or 3.53 units/min for a certain size. This rate should then be used for all products of that size and format. If a slower rate is used for difficult product within that family of products, then the reduction in OEE should be noted in the Comments column. In this way, any loss due to non-manufacturable product can be recognized and communicated. (This step is important for pricing products properly). If the equipment system is not the bottleneck of the product flow, then the ideal speed rate should be defined as the desired rate to feed the bottleneck. OEE is then measured against desired speed with the understanding that the maximum speed factor is 1.0. (Overspeed should be used only for scheduled make up situations, and noted in the remarks so that inventory balancing can be reconciled.)

      imageLoading Time. Also called Scheduled Time or Planned Production Time. The time that normal operations intend to make production. It includes all events that are common to meeting delivery schedules, such as product changeovers or transitions, set ups, information downloads, all production run time, and unplanned stoppages for equipment, people, quality, and testing.

      СКАЧАТЬ