Global Residence and Citizenship Programs 2016. Henley & Partners
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Global Residence and Citizenship Programs 2016 - Henley & Partners страница 8
Название: Global Residence and Citizenship Programs 2016
Автор: Henley & Partners
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Юриспруденция, право
isbn: 9780992781897
isbn:
Regardless of the level of state involvement in the funds once received, there is a significant reputational risk for the country if it later becomes known that these funds have not been legally obtained. If thorough due diligence on applicants is not conducted, this not only puts the country’s international reputation at risk, but there may be consequences for all citizens, such as visa restrictions applied to all nationals by other countries. This also risks the future viability of the immigrant investor program should the country become less attractive to legitimate investors. Political fallout can also be severe.
The motivations for investors seeking economic citizenship can be grouped into four general categories: the need to survive for political or national refugees from countries affected by civil war, natural disasters, famines or similar events; the desire to travel to access business and other opportunities; the ability for individuals to enjoy full civil rights, such as voting, buying property and the right to work and / or benefit from a more favorable tax regime; and the desire of criminals (suspected or confirmed) to escape justice. By the establishment of a robust due diligence process, states welcoming new citizens must verify initial motivations behind the choice of a new passport. In any case the new citizenship may be granted for the wrong reasons. Our era of transparency doesn’t forgive unnecessary risks, especially when it comes to citizenship and sovereignty, hence the extreme importance of conducting due diligence processes when examining a file.
In reality, an investor’s motivation can be a combination of two or more factors. The categories themselves are strongly interdependent and difficult to differentiate. It is critical that immigrant investor program administrators conduct sufficient due diligence on applicants to ensure that their motivations and source of funds are clearly understood. This is a key step in differentiating between a political refugee, a person seeking legitimate tax benefits, and a terrorist or money launderer. Clearly, each category has different implications for the country. The risk of harboring undesirable immigrant investors has led to a proliferation of treaties on international cooperation as well as extradition agreements.
If a country inadvertently grants citizenship to terrorists, money launderers or other criminals, the reputational damage it is likely to suffer will decrease its attractiveness to other law-abiding investors, damaging the prospects of their immigrant investor program. There is a reputational risk to a country if it is shown later to be ignorant of the source of any money invested into it via an immigrant program. Stimulating a country’s economy with the proceeds of crime is never a good idea. The country also runs the risk of being accused by other countries of harboring criminals. Corruption risk is also likely to increase should criminals identify that country as a good prospect for second citizenship. Government officials involved in the immigrant investment program are likely to be targeted with bribes.
Countries may also face consequences from international institutions such as the United Nations (UN) or the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), if evidence of due diligence or other such information is requested and the country cannot provide it. Such actions could have serious political, reputational and financial consequences for the country. There is also a continual increase in regulatory requirements, many of which affect citizens outside the countries enacting them. FATCA (the Foreign Accounts Tax Compliance Act), for example, requires individuals to report their offshore financial accounts, and obliges foreign financial institutions to report to the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regarding their American clients. With the increase in regulations, countries need to ensure that where they have an obligation to ensure compliance, they do so. At the same time, increased regulation means an increase in people and entities that fall foul of these regulations, and who must be flagged as non-compliant or recalcitrant.
The country therefore needs to have strong procedures in place to ensure that they are able to both keep away undesirable investors and ensure that they comply with international regulations and guidelines. It is very clear that countries need to demonstrate their commitment to thoroughly understanding the background, source of funds and likely intentions of immigrant investor applicants. At the very least, these are likely to include verification of identity, background checks and research based on the applicant’s nationality. It is also essential to check international databases and those of other countries, to ensure that the subject does not have an undeclared second nationality. The country would also have to check that the applicant is not subject to sanctions and establish whether they have a criminal record in another country.
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.
Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.