The Science of Reading. Группа авторов
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу The Science of Reading - Группа авторов страница 54

Название: The Science of Reading

Автор: Группа авторов

Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited

Жанр: Языкознание

Серия:

isbn: 9781119705130

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ style="font-size:15px;">      59 Perre, L., Pattamadilok, C., Montant, M., & Ziegler, J. C. (2009). Orthographic effects in spoken language: On‐line activation or phonological restructuring? Brain Research, 1275, 73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.04.018.

      60 Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114(2), 273–315. doi: 10.1037/0033‐295X.114.2.273.

      61 Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(1), 148–162. doi: 10.1037//0096‐1523.18.1.148.

      62 Pritchard, S. C., Coltheart, M., Palethorpe, S., & Castles, A. (2012). Nonword reading: Comparing dual‐route cascaded and connectionist dual‐process models with human data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(5), 1268–1288. doi: 10.1037/a0026703.

      63 Rastle, K. & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? Cognitive Psychology, 53, 97–145. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.01.002.

      64 Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1999). Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(2), 482–503. doi: 10.1037/0096‐1523.25.2.482.

      65 Rayner, K., McConkie, G. W., & Zola, D. (1980). Integrating information across eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 206–226. doi: 10.1016/0010‐0285(80)90009‐2.

      66 Reis, A., Araújo, S., Morais, I. S., & Faísca, L. (2020). Reading and reading‐related skills in adults with dyslexia from different orthographic systems: A review and meta‐analysis. Annals of Dyslexia. Advance publication available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881‐020‐00205‐x.

      67 Roebuck, H., & Lupyan, G. (2020). The Internal Representations Questionnaire: Measuring modes of thinking. Behavior Research Methods, 52(5), 2053–2070. doi: 10.3758/s13428‐020‐01354‐y.

      68 Schmalz, X., Marinus, E., Coltheart, M., & Castles, A. (2015). Getting to the bottom of orthographic depth. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(6), 1614–1629. doi: 10.3758/s13423‐015‐0835‐2.

      69 Seidenberg, M.S., & McClelland, J.L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of visual word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568. doi: 10.1037/0033‐295x.96.4.523.

      70 Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self‐teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72(2), 95–129. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1998.2481.

      71 Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (2020). Annual Research Review: Reading disorders revisited –The critical importance of oral language. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 62(5), 635–653. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13324.

      72 Tan, L. H., Laird, A. R., Li, K., & Fox, P. T. (2005). Neuroanatomical correlates of phonological processing of Chinese characters and alphabetic words: A meta‐analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 25(1), 83–91. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20134.

      73 Taylor, J. S. H., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2013). Can cognitive models explain brain activation during word and pseudoword reading? A meta‐analysis of 36 neuroimaging studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 766–791. doi: 10.1037/a0030266.

      74 Timmer, K., Ganushchak, L. Y., Ceusters, I., & Schiller, N. O. (2014). Second language phonology influences first language word naming. Brain and Language, 133, 14–25. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.03.004.

      75 van der Haegen, L., Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Collateralization of Broca’s area and the visual word form area in left‐handers: fMRI evidence. Brain and Language, 122, 171–178. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.11.004.

      76 van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15(3), 181–198. doi: 10.3758/bf03197716.

      77 van Wijnendaele, I., & Brysbaert, M. (2002). Visual word recognition in bilinguals: Phonological priming from the second to the first language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(3), 616–627. doi: 10.1037/0096‐1523.28.3.616.

      78 Vasilev, M. R., Yates, M., & Slattery, T. J. (2019). Do readers integrate phonological codes across saccades? A Bayesian meta‐analysis and a survey of the unpublished literature. Journal of Cognition, 2(1), 43. doi: 10.5334/joc.87.

      79 Vilhauer, R. (2016). Inner reading voices: An overlooked form of inner speech. Psychosis, 8(1), 37–47. doi: 10.1080/17522439.2015.1028972.

      80 Vilhauer, R. P. (2017). Characteristics of inner reading voices. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58(4), 269–274. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12368.

      81 Ward, N. (1998). Artificial intelligence and other approaches to speech understanding: Reflection on methodology. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 10, 487–493. doi: 10.1080/095281398146716.

      82 Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 221–243. doi: 10.3758/bf03196158.

      83 Woollams, A. M., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Madrid, G., & Patterson, K. E. (2016). Do you read how I read? Systematic individual differences in semantic reliance amongst normal readers. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1757. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01757.

      84 Wright, G., Sherman, R., & Jones, T. B. (2004). Are silent reading behaviors of first graders really silent? The Reading Teacher, 57(6), 546–553.

      85 Wu, Y. J., & Thierry, G. (2010). Chinese–English bilinguals reading English hear Chinese. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(22), 7646–7651. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1602‐10.2010.

      86 Xu, B., & Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Nonstrategic subjective threshold effects in phonemic masking. Memory & Cognition, 27(1), 26–36. doi: 10.3758/bf03201210.

      87 Zhang, S., & Perfetti, C. A. (1993). The tongue‐twister effect in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1082–1093. doi: 10.1037/0278‐7393.19.5.1082.

      88 Zhao, R., Fan, R., Liu, M., Wang, X., & Yang, J. (2017). Rethinking the function of brain regions for reading Chinese characters in a meta‐analysis of fMRI studies. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 44, 120–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.04.001.

      89 Zhou, H., Chen, B., Yang, M., & Dunlap, S. (2010). Language nonselective access to phonological representations: Evidence from Chinese–English bilinguals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(10), 2051–2066. doi: 10.1080/17470211003718705.

      90 Zhou, P., & Christianson, K. (2016). I “hear” what you're “saying”: Auditory perceptual simulation, reading speed, and reading comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(5), 972–995. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1018282.

      91 Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29. doi: 10.1037/0033‐2909.131.1.3.

      92 Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Modelling reading development through phonological decoding and self‐teaching: Implications СКАЧАТЬ