Название: Recommendation Application A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition
Автор: Gerardus Blokdyk
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Зарубежная деловая литература
isbn: 9781867460503
isbn:
<--- Score
100. How do you think the partners involved in Recommendation application would have defined success?
<--- Score
101. Will a Recommendation application production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
102. What is the definition of Recommendation application excellence?
<--- Score
103. Who approved the Recommendation application scope?
<--- Score
104. What is in scope?
<--- Score
105. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
106. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
107. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
108. How do you manage changes in Recommendation application requirements?
<--- Score
109. Are accountability and ownership for Recommendation application clearly defined?
<--- Score
110. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
111. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
112. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
113. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
114. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
115. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
116. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
117. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
118. Has the Recommendation application work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
119. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
120. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
121. Do you all define Recommendation application in the same way?
<--- Score
122. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Recommendation application?
<--- Score
123. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
124. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
125. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
126. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Recommendation application work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
127. Is there any additional Recommendation application definition of success?
<--- Score
128. Are the Recommendation application requirements testable?
<--- Score
129. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
130. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
131. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
132. What are the record-keeping requirements of Recommendation application activities?
<--- Score
133. Have all basic functions of Recommendation application been defined?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Recommendation application Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?
<--- Score
2. Are there measurements based on task performance?
<--- Score
3. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?
<--- Score
4. How can a Recommendation application test verify your ideas or assumptions?
<--- СКАЧАТЬ