Название: Recommendation Application A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition
Автор: Gerardus Blokdyk
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Зарубежная деловая литература
isbn: 9781867460503
isbn:
55. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
56. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
57. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
58. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
59. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
60. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
61. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
62. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
63. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Recommendation application? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
64. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
65. What are the Recommendation application tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
66. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
67. What are (control) requirements for Recommendation application Information?
<--- Score
68. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
69. How does the Recommendation application manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
70. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
71. What is the scope of Recommendation application?
<--- Score
72. Is there a critical path to deliver Recommendation application results?
<--- Score
73. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
74. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
75. Is Recommendation application linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
76. What system do you use for gathering Recommendation application information?
<--- Score
77. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
78. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
79. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
80. Are the Recommendation application requirements complete?
<--- Score
81. What would be the goal or target for a Recommendation application’s improvement team?
<--- Score
82. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
83. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
84. How would you define Recommendation application leadership?
<--- Score
85. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
86. Is the Recommendation application scope manageable?
<--- Score
87. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
88. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
89. How are consistent Recommendation application definitions important?
<--- Score
90. Is the Recommendation application scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
91. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
92. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
93. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
94. What is the context?
<--- Score
95. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
96. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
97. Is Recommendation application currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
98. Who is gathering Recommendation application information?
<--- Score
99. Is scope creep really СКАЧАТЬ