Название: Transaction Payments As A Service A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition
Автор: Gerardus Blokdyk
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Зарубежная деловая литература
isbn: 9781867459699
isbn:
5. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
6. Have all basic functions of Transaction payments as a service been defined?
<--- Score
7. What system do you use for gathering Transaction payments as a service information?
<--- Score
8. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
9. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
10. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
11. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
12. How do you catch Transaction payments as a service definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
13. What is in scope?
<--- Score
14. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
15. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
16. What gets examined?
<--- Score
17. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
18. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
19. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
20. Has the Transaction payments as a service work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
21. Is Transaction payments as a service linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
22. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
23. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
24. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
25. How have you defined all Transaction payments as a service requirements first?
<--- Score
26. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
27. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
28. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
29. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
30. What would be the goal or target for a Transaction payments as a service’s improvement team?
<--- Score
31. What happens if Transaction payments as a service’s scope changes?
<--- Score
32. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
33. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
34. How will the Transaction payments as a service team and the group measure complete success of Transaction payments as a service?
<--- Score
35. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
36. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
37. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
38. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
39. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
40. What is the scope?
<--- Score
41. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
42. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
43. Will a Transaction payments as a service production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
44. Do you all define Transaction payments as a service in the same way?
<--- Score
45. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
46. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
47. What was the context?
<--- СКАЧАТЬ