Название: Working Assets A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition
Автор: Gerardus Blokdyk
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Зарубежная деловая литература
isbn: 9781867456797
isbn:
<--- Score
65. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
66. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
67. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
68. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
69. How do you hand over Working Assets context?
<--- Score
70. Is there a clear Working Assets case definition?
<--- Score
71. What are the Working Assets tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
72. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Working Assets brings?
<--- Score
73. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Working Assets? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
74. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
75. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
76. Is the Working Assets scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
77. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
78. Is the Working Assets scope manageable?
<--- Score
79. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Working Assets changes?
<--- Score
80. Is the scope of Working Assets defined?
<--- Score
81. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
82. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
83. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
84. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
85. What Working Assets services do you require?
<--- Score
86. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
87. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
88. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
89. Who are the Working Assets improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
90. Is there a critical path to deliver Working Assets results?
<--- Score
91. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
92. Has the Working Assets work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
93. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Working Assets work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
94. What would be the goal or target for a Working Assets’s improvement team?
<--- Score
95. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
96. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
97. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
98. Will a Working Assets production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
99. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
100. How did the Working Assets manager receive input to the development of a Working Assets improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
101. Who approved the Working Assets scope?
<--- Score
102. How do you manage changes in Working Assets requirements?
<--- Score
103. How do you manage unclear Working Assets requirements?
<--- Score
104. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
105. What are the Working Assets use cases?
<--- Score
106. What are the record-keeping requirements of Working Assets activities?
<--- Score
107. Are all requirements met?
<--- СКАЧАТЬ