Acoustic and Vibrational Enhanced Oil Recovery. George V. Chilingar
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Acoustic and Vibrational Enhanced Oil Recovery - George V. Chilingar страница 11

Название: Acoustic and Vibrational Enhanced Oil Recovery

Автор: George V. Chilingar

Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited

Жанр: Физика

Серия:

isbn: 9781119760177

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ epicenter was located at a distance of 130 to 170 km from the producing wells. In all three cases, a decrease in water cut and a respective increase in oil production was recorded in about a week after the earthquake. Nevertheless, on the average, decrease in the water cut was about 40% for all three wells for a considerable period of time. This and other similar facts led to extensive laboratory and field studies of artificial vibro-seismic enhancement of oil production. Theoretical and experimental aspects of this phenomenon and the mechanism of enhanced oil recovery due to the presence of elastic waves generated by surface-based vibrators have been studied during the last 40 years by Surguchev et al. (1984) [34], Simkin and Surguchev (1991) [31], Simkin (1992) [30], and Kouznetsov and Simkin (1994) [21].

      In 1987, at one of Professor George V. Chilingar’s Petroleum Engineering Classes at the University of Southern California, his star student from Iran, K. Majid Sadeghi gave a lecture on his research on vibrational dewatering of contaminated muds. Professor Chilingar asked Sadeghi: “Now that we can dewater muds, can we use this technology to increase the production of oil from the oil sands? Sadeghi answered: “Absolutely.”

      Based on extensive observations, shales composed of non-expandable clays such as kaolinite and illite did not act as source rocks, because of the absence of water necessary to push out the oil (Chilingar and Knight, 1960 [11]; Aoyagi et al., 1975 [4]). Also, many undercompacted (overpressed) shales did not act as source rocks, because compaction mechanisms were not operative to squeeze the oil into the reservoir rocks.

      It is necessary to establish what conditions existed during the primary migration of oil (from the source rocks to reservoir rocks) compared to those during the secondary migration of oil (during production) to make the former so much more efficient. Several possible explanations are presented below. Among them are (1) seismic activity (earthquakes), (2) intense electrokinetics, (3) Earth tides, (4) compaction, and (5) migration in a gaseous form.

       1.1.1 Seismicity

      According to the site http://www.iris.washington.edu/SeismiQuery/events.htm, 66 earthquakes with magnitudes 2 or higher occurred over the globe on average per night for the period from 01.01.2000 to 01.01.2010.

      Assuming that the seismic activity of the planet Earth was the same as at the beginning of the 21st century, one can calculate how many earthquakes occurred during the Paleozoic, Mesozoic, and Cenozoic times:

       In the Paleozoic 69,507,200 million

       In the Mesozoic 27,429,750 million

       During the Cenozoic 7,924,150 million

      On considering precursor activity of earthquakes, the minimum frequency oscillations in the number of earthquakes, and gravity attraction of the Sun and the Moon, then the volume of fluid movements due to dynamic forces in the migration routes in the geological past was immense (Fedin et al., 2013 [14]).

      The physical theory behind the application of seismic vibration to increase production was discussed in detail by Beresnev and Johnson (1994) [5], Beresnev (2006) [6], Kouznetsov et al. (1998) [18], (2001) [19], (2002) [20], Pride et al. (2008) [26], and Fedin et al., (2013) [14].

       1.1.2 Electrokinetics

Schematic illustration of electrokinetic double layer.

      Upon application of direct electric current, the mobile double-layer moves toward the cathode, dragging the free water. A schematic diagram of EEOR field setup, as used by Wittle et al. (2008) [38] and СКАЧАТЬ