Power Flow Control Solutions for a Modern Grid Using SMART Power Flow Controllers. Kalyan K. Sen
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Power Flow Control Solutions for a Modern Grid Using SMART Power Flow Controllers - Kalyan K. Sen страница 24

СКАЧАТЬ illustration of transmission line voltage Phase Angle Regulators: (a) asymmetric and (b) symmetric."/> Schematic illustration of transmission line Reactance Regulators: (a) Thyristor-Controlled Series Capacitor (TCSC) and (b) Static Synchronous Series Compensator (SSSC).

      When discussing dynamic and transient events, mechanical LTCs react in ≈ 3–5 s (3,000–5,000 ms); TC LTCs react in < 1 s (1,000 ms) and IGBT‐based converters react in < 0.010 s (10 ms). These different technologies are referred to as slow, medium speed, and fast, respectively. Note that as the response time of a particular solution increases from slow using mechanical LTCs to medium speed using TC LTCs to fast using IGBTs, there is a corresponding increase in the solution’s life‐cycle costs (installation, operation, and maintenance), complexity, and impracticability of relocation. Other important features to consider are reliability, efficiency, component non‐obsolescence, and interoperability.

      For more than a century, the transmission line voltage magnitude has been regulated with transformers and tap changers. They are referred to, in this book, as the VRT in the form of a two‐winding transformer with galvanically isolated primary and secondary windings, called a Shunt–Shunt configuration, and an autotransformer with an electrical connection between the primary and secondary windings, called a Shunt–Series configuration. In both types of transformers, the line voltage is applied to the primary windings. In the two‐winding transformer, the full line voltage is induced in the secondary windings, whereas, in the autotransformer, only a fraction of the line voltage is induced in the secondary windings that are connected to the primary windings to produce the full line voltage. In both cases, the magnitude of the line voltage is regulated. The secondary voltage is varied with the use of LTCs. An LTC can step up/down the voltage without interruption of the load current. Both primary and secondary windings in the two‐winding transformer carry the full transmitted power. Both primary and secondary windings in the autotransformer carry only a fraction of the full transmitted power. Therefore, if the galvanic isolation is not needed, the rating of the transformer can be significantly reduced with a Shunt–Series configuration as compared to a Shunt–Shunt configuration. Regardless of which configuration is used, the voltages at the input (primary) and output (secondary) terminals of both a two‐winding transformer and an autotransformer are identical as discussed in Chapter 4, Section 4.1.

Schematic illustration of ranges of voltages (Vs and Vs′) at the primary and secondary sides of a Voltage-Regulating Transformer.

      Voltage regulation can also be achieved by the field control of a synchronous motor (Synchronous Condenser or SynCon) that generates or absorbs var as in the cases of a shunt‐connected capacitor or a shunt‐connected reactor. Voltage regulation can also be achieved when the back emf of the SynCon is replaced with a power electronics‐based Voltage‐Sourced Converter (VSC), which is called STATCOM as discussed in Chapter 2, Section 2.3.1.2. More discussion on this topic is given in “Introduction to FACTS Controllers: Theory, Modeling, and Applications,” by Sen and Sen, IEEE Press and John Wiley & Sons, 2009, Chapter 8, Section 8.1.

      The power flow in a transmission line has traditionally been regulated with the use of a PAR. The line voltage is applied to the primary windings and the induced secondary voltage, called a compensating voltage that is varied with the use of LTCs is connected in series with the line. This compensating voltage is in quadrature with the phase‐to‐neutral voltage and as a result, the phase angle of the line voltage is regulated as discussed in Chapters 2 and 4. The PAR is configured in two forms – PAR asymmetric (asym) and symmetric (sym). In the process of varying the phase angle of the line voltage, a PAR (asym) also increases the magnitude of the line voltage. In a PAR (sym), while the phase angle is varied, the magnitude of the line voltage stays unchanged. When a high power flow enhancement is desired, the application of a PAR (sym) becomes limited, because of the need for a large amount of reactive power flow through the line. This large amount of reactive power flow creates significant additional losses, because of a large line current. Also, a larger‐than‐necessary rating of the PAR results when a large increase in active power flow is desired as discussed in Chapter 2, Section 2.5.2. Also as discussed in Chapter 2, Section 2.2.2.6, a PAR emulates an impedance in series with the line; however, this emulated impedance is not an independently controlled resistance and reactance; therefore, a PAR cannot control the active and reactive power flows in the line independently, whereas an IR offers an independent control of active and reactive power flows in the line as desired.