Exploring evaluative, emotive and persuasive strategies in discourse. AAVV

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ Positive Polarity and Sentence Construction’ by Rosa Muñoz-Luna. The author examines language in successful persuasive discourse. In particular, she analyses morphological, lexical and syntactic features, namely, the use of pronouns (for self-reference), positive polarity adjectives, and sentence construction. By using NVivo® software, Muñoz-Luna examines two speeches by female participants in TV show Dragons’ Den. As the author shows, NVivo® measures the total number of references of each token analysed (personal pronouns, positive adjectives and sentence length), and then provides relative parameters which indicate the degree of frequency of an item over the rest in a particular context. Results show that more persuasive oral discourse contains a higher amount of self-references to the speaker, a frequent use of positive polarity items and short and balanced sentences.

      ‘Digital Storytelling and the Art of the Emotional Appeal: The Case of Despite My Fears’ by Isabel Alonso-Belmonte. Alonso-Belmonte explores the multimodal expression of emotions in a digital story title Despite My Fears. By drawing on a combination of different functionally-oriented approaches to the study of multimodal texts, this chapter draws attention to the digital narrator’s conscious use of multimodal resources to generate empathy, to emotionally touch the audience and eventually, to send a message of empowerment and success. Results show that positive emotions are maximised over negative ones by the use of specific visual and aural resources which reinforce, compare and clarify the verbal message. Findings are discussed in relation with more recent research on digital narratives.

      The volume makes manifest that evaluative, emotive and persuasive strategies are pervasive in many linguistic manifestations and are implemented by an ample spectrum of linguistic and non-linguistic devices. No single methodological framework, nor a definite set of linguistic devices can account in isolation for what makes a given discourse sample persuasive; thus, a miscellanea of discursive approaches like the one offered in this volume can shed some light of what contributes to the persuasion of a text and to what extend persuasion is achieved by evaluation and/or other means.

      Evaluation, emotion and persuasion, as well as their interplay, are examined through the prism of theoretical frameworks with a vast and well-established research tradition, such as the Appraisal Framework, Functional Linguistics, or Critical Discourse Analysis. Furthermore, the analyses cover three key linguistic levels: morphology, syntax and discourse as a whole, which are analyzed empirically in data samples gathered from real and diverse socio-cultural settings.

       Acknowledgements

      The present study was financially supported by a grant (ID No: FFI2013-47792-C2-2-P). This chapter is part of the long-term research Project ‘EMOtion and language at work’: The discursive emotive/evaluative FUNction in different texts and contexts within corporate and institutional work: PROject PERsuasion (EMOFUN-DETT: PROPER).

       References

      Bamford, Julia (2007). “Evaluating the positive: Evaluation and persuasive discourse in business presentations”. In Bamford, Julia and Rita Salvi (eds.). Business Discourse: Language at Work. Roma: Aracne Editrice, pp. 135-155.

      Blutner, Reinhard (1998). “Lexical pragmatics”. Journal of Semantics 15, 115–162.

      Blutner, Reinhard (2004). “Pragmatics and the lexicon”. In Horn, Laurence, H. and Gregory Ward (eds.). The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 488–514.

      Cabrejas-Peñuelas, Ana B. and Mercedes Díez-Prados (2013). “The evaluative function of cohesive devices in three political texts”. In Kecskes, Istvan and Jesús Romero-Trillo (eds.). Research Trends in Intercultural Pragmatics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 317-341.

      Cabrejas-Peñuelas, Ana B. and Mercedes Díez-Prados (2014). “Positive Self-evaluation versus Negative Other-evaluation in the Political Genre or Pre-election Debates”. Discourse & Society 25 (2), 159-185.

      Cockcroft, Robert et al. (2014). Persuading People. An Introduction to Rhetoric. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

      Díez-Prados, Mercedes (2016). “The use of metaphor and evaluation as discourse strategies in pre-electoral debates: Just about winning votes”. In Romano, Manuela and Dolores Porto (eds.). Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co, pp. 215-244.

      Díez-Prados, Mercedes, and Ana B. Cabrejas-Peñuelas (2012). “Cohesion in American political rhetoric: The Gettysburg Address, I have a dream and Obama’s Inaugural Address”. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense 20, 37-60.

      Gass, Robert H. and John S. Seiter (2015). Social Influence and Compliance Gaining. London: Routledge.

      García-Gómez, Antonio (2007). Habla Conflictiva como Acción Social. Discurso y Cognición. Oviedo: Septem Ediciones.

      Kolaiti, Patricia, and Deirdre Wilson (2014). “Corpus Analysis and Lexical Pragmatics: An Overview”. International Review of Pragmatics 6, 211-239.

      Kress, Gunther (2000). “Multimodality”. In Gunther Kress (ed.). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge, pp. ed. by, 182-202.

      Kress, Gunther (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.

      Lakhani, David (2005). Persuasion: The Art of Getting What You Want. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

      Lakoff, Robin (1982). “Persuasive discourse and ordinary conversation, with examples from advertising”. In Deborah Tannen (ed.) Analyzing discourse: Text and Talk. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, pp. 25-42

      Levinson, Stephen C. (2000). Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

      Louw, Bill (1993). “Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies”. In Baker, Mona and Gill Francis and Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds.). Text & Technology: In honour of John Sinclair. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co, pp. 157-176.

      Martin, Fiona (2006). “New media, new audiences”. In Cunningham, Stuart and Graeme Turner (ed.). The Media and Communications in Australia. Australia: Allen and Unwin, pp. 315-328.

      Martin, James R. and Peter R. R. White (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

      Peel, Ellen (2002). Politics, Persuasion, and Pragmatism: A Rhetoric of Feminist Utopian Fiction. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

      Pishwa, Hanna (2009). Language and Social Cognition. Expression of the Social Mind. Berlin / New York, Mouton de Gruyter.

      Pullman, George (2013). Persuasion. History, Theory, Practice. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.

      Santiago Guervós, Javier de (2012). Principios de Comunicación Persuasiva. Madrid: Arco Libros, S.L.

      Sinclair, John (2000). “Lexical Grammar”. Naujoji Metodologija 24, 191-203.

      Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

      Taillard, Marie-Odile (2000). “Persuasive Communication: The case of marketing”. Working Papers in Linguistics 12, 145-172.

      ZIatev, Jordan (2007). СКАЧАТЬ