Plato: The Complete Works (31 Books). Plato
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Plato: The Complete Works (31 Books) - Plato страница 54

Название: Plato: The Complete Works (31 Books)

Автор: Plato

Издательство: Bookwire

Жанр: Философия

Серия:

isbn: 9782378079437

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ Polus, the reason why we provide ourselves with friends and children is, that when we get old and stumble, a younger generation may be at hand to set us on our legs again in our words and in our actions: and now, if I and Gorgias are stumbling, here are you who should raise us up; and I for my part engage to retract any error into which you may think that I have fallen-upon one condition:

      POLUS: What condition?

      SOCRATES: That you contract, Polus, the prolixity of speech in which you indulged at first.

      POLUS: What! do you mean that I may not use as many words as I please?

      SOCRATES: Only to think, my friend, that having come on a visit to Athens, which is the most free-spoken state in Hellas, you when you got there, and you alone, should be deprived of the power of speech—that would be hard indeed. But then consider my case:—shall not I be very hardly used, if, when you are making a long oration, and refusing to answer what you are asked, I am compelled to stay and listen to you, and may not go away? I say rather, if you have a real interest in the argument, or, to repeat my former expression, have any desire to set it on its legs, take back any statement which you please; and in your turn ask and answer, like myself and Gorgias—refute and be refuted: for I suppose that you would claim to know what Gorgias knows—would you not?

      POLUS: Yes.

      SOCRATES: And you, like him, invite any one to ask you about anything which he pleases, and you will know how to answer him?

      POLUS: To be sure.

      SOCRATES: And now, which will you do, ask or answer?

      POLUS: I will ask; and do you answer me, Socrates, the same question which Gorgias, as you suppose, is unable to answer: What is rhetoric?

      SOCRATES: Do you mean what sort of an art?

      POLUS: Yes.

      SOCRATES: To say the truth, Polus, it is not an art at all, in my opinion.

      POLUS: Then what, in your opinion, is rhetoric?

      SOCRATES: A thing which, as I was lately reading in a book of yours, you say that you have made an art.

      POLUS: What thing?

      SOCRATES: I should say a sort of experience.

      POLUS: Does rhetoric seem to you to be an experience?

      SOCRATES: That is my view, but you may be of another mind.

      POLUS: An experience in what?

      SOCRATES: An experience in producing a sort of delight and gratification.

      POLUS: And if able to gratify others, must not rhetoric be a fine thing?

      SOCRATES: What are you saying, Polus? Why do you ask me whether rhetoric is a fine thing or not, when I have not as yet told you what rhetoric is?

      POLUS: Did I not hear you say that rhetoric was a sort of experience?

      SOCRATES: Will you, who are so desirous to gratify others, afford a slight gratification to me?

      POLUS: I will.

      SOCRATES: Will you ask me, what sort of an art is cookery?

      POLUS: What sort of an art is cookery?

      SOCRATES: Not an art at all, Polus.

      POLUS: What then?

      SOCRATES: I should say an experience.

      POLUS: In what? I wish that you would explain to me.

      SOCRATES: An experience in producing a sort of delight and gratification, Polus.

      POLUS: Then are cookery and rhetoric the same?

      SOCRATES: No, they are only different parts of the same profession.

      POLUS: Of what profession?

      SOCRATES: I am afraid that the truth may seem discourteous; and I hesitate to answer, lest Gorgias should imagine that I am making fun of his own profession. For whether or no this is that art of rhetoric which Gorgias practises I really cannot tell:—from what he was just now saying, nothing appeared of what he thought of his art, but the rhetoric which I mean is a part of a not very creditable whole.

      GORGIAS: A part of what, Socrates? Say what you mean, and never mind me.

      SOCRATES: In my opinion then, Gorgias, the whole of which rhetoric is a part is not an art at all, but the habit of a bold and ready wit, which knows how to manage mankind: this habit I sum up under the word ‘flattery’; and it appears to me to have many other parts, one of which is cookery, which may seem to be an art, but, as I maintain, is only an experience or routine and not an art:—another part is rhetoric, and the art of attiring and sophistry are two others: thus there are four branches, and four different things answering to them. And Polus may ask, if he likes, for he has not as yet been informed, what part of flattery is rhetoric: he did not see that I had not yet answered him when he proceeded to ask a further question: Whether I do not think rhetoric a fine thing? But I shall not tell him whether rhetoric is a fine thing or not, until I have first answered, ‘What is rhetoric?’ For that would not be right, Polus; but I shall be happy to answer, if you will ask me, What part of flattery is rhetoric?

      POLUS: I will ask and do you answer? What part of flattery is rhetoric?

      SOCRATES: Will you understand my answer? Rhetoric, according to my view, is the ghost or counterfeit of a part of politics.

      POLUS: And noble or ignoble?

      SOCRATES: Ignoble, I should say, if I am compelled to answer, for I call what is bad ignoble: though I doubt whether you understand what I was saying before.

      GORGIAS: Indeed, Socrates, I cannot say that I understand myself.

      SOCRATES: I do not wonder, Gorgias; for I have not as yet explained myself, and our friend Polus, colt by name and colt by nature, is apt to run away. (This is an untranslatable play on the name ‘Polus,’ which means ‘a colt.’)

      GORGIAS: Never mind him, but explain to me what you mean by saying that rhetoric is the counterfeit of a part of politics.

      SOCRATES: I will try, then, to explain my notion of rhetoric, and if I am mistaken, my friend Polus shall refute me. We may assume the existence of bodies and of souls?

      GORGIAS: Of course.

      SOCRATES: You would further admit that there is a good condition of either of them?

      GORGIAS: Yes.

      SOCRATES: Which condition may not be really good, but good only in appearance? I mean to say, that there are many persons who appear to be in good health, and whom only a physician or trainer will discern at first sight not to be in good health.

      GORGIAS: True.

      SOCRATES: And this applies not only to the body, but also to the soul: in either there may be that which gives the appearance of health and not the reality?

      GORGIAS: Yes, certainly.

      SOCRATES: СКАЧАТЬ