Integrating Sustainability Into Major Projects. Wayne McPhee
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Integrating Sustainability Into Major Projects - Wayne McPhee страница 9
Название: Integrating Sustainability Into Major Projects
Автор: Wayne McPhee
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Жанр: Управление, подбор персонала
isbn: 9781119557890
isbn:
Figure 1.1 Sustainability versus compliance. Adapted from Wheeler, Colbert, and Freeman (2002) reproduced with permission of the Journal of General Management.
Sustainable Project Management
Another way to think about project sustainability is outlined in Figure 1.2, which shows how projects can be considered sustainable in two ways. A project is plotted based on its underlying sustainability features (x-axis) where some projects, such as a wind farm, are typically considered to be “sustainable projects” and thus are placed further to the right on the x-axis. On the other hand, nonrenewable resource extraction projects, such as a mine, are considered unsustainable by their fundamental nature (i.e. removing a resource from the earth that will not be replaced) and so are placed further to the left on the x-axis.
An alternative view (on the y-axis) is to look at how the project is managed to improve its overall sustainability. For example, a typical mine that extracts a nonrenewable resource may not be considered fundamentally sustainable, but if development can be managed to mitigate environmental impacts, reduce energy requirements, and create benefits for local communities, then it can still create a positive benefit. In this case, the mining project would move from a low position on the graph to a higher, more sustainable position.
Figure 1.2 Sustainable project management model.
Conceptually, the sustainability focus for the project team should be on how they can move the project as far as possible to the upper right of the graph while maintaining the underlying organizational objectives.
Project teams rarely have control over the underlying sustainability features of the project that they are working on. But they do have the ability to improve project management and delivery to reduce negative impacts and improve benefits. One of the core themes of this book is to help project teams define what sustainability means for their project and then provide tools and systems to help them achieve that vision and focus.
Complexity Is the New Reality
Managing major projects is a messy and complex business. It is getting even more complex with competing priorities for budget, schedule, quality, safety, environment, security, and community. Project teams need to develop the skills, tools, workflows, and thought processes to manage these competing priorities, make informed decisions, and create new solutions that help meet often contradictory project goals. These challenges are also opportunities for innovation, for new approaches, and for collaboration to solve problems.
A key starting point in developing a mindset about sustainability is to be aware that there will be both competing and complementary objectives between the traditional technical and financial goals, and the sustainability goals. Project teams need to embrace this complexity and view sustainability as an opportunity to create a better project, rather than as an annoyance and additional cost. In Reconstructing Value: Leadership Skills for a Sustainable World, the authors refer to this approach as a “sustainability Mindset,” where there is a synthesis of these competing challenges rather than just a compromise:
A sustainability mindset holds that the key challenge is in advancing human development in areas such as prosperity, justice and human rights, while at the same time preserving nature and respecting the regenerative limits of the biosphere.3
The sustainability mindset understands that new major projects are essential to human development but also looks to ensure that the work is done with respect for the environment and the local communities impacted by the project.
Sustainability is creating more complex business and technical environments, and project teams cannot manage increasing project complexity with the same processes and tools that have been used for years. Project teams need to look for ways to improve existing tools and processes to incorporate sustainability. They need to introduce new tools that help manage the increasing complexity, shift roles and responsibilities, and diversify project teams to bring in new and varying skills sets to ensure that sustainability challenges are managed.
By our nature, we are more comfortable solving problems that are familiar. However, with the rapid changes occurring in the world, project teams are often faced with new problems that don't have proven solutions. If we are going to meet the challenges of this new reality, we will need to adapt and find new ways of collaborating and working together to solve problems.
When we face changes that encompass several disciplines, there is a need for collaboration with multidisciplinary teams that can bring a broad range of experience and expertise to the problem. These multidisciplinary project teams are comprised not just of technical specialists, but may include new team members who have valuable knowledge of the challenges facing the project, including socioeconomic and geopolitical experts, academics, stakeholders, and a facilitator who can bring the team together. Complexity is the new reality and project teams need to find ways of working together and with key stakeholders to meet this challenge and create better, more sustainable projects.
Co-Creating Value
As projects move toward a sustainability focus, stakeholder engagement is shifting from compliance and risk mitigation to looking for opportunities that create positive relationships that can uncover the project's potential to co-create value for both the organization and local communities. This has been named “Creating Shared Value” by Porter and Kramer.4
Opportunities for collaborating and co-creating value can be evaluated by answering a number of initial questions aimed at understanding both the planned or current project impacts and the potential for value creation, but also the potential for new activities that can create shared value that neither player could achieve on their own. These questions are:
1 What impact(s) does the project and its activities have on each element of the society?
2 What impacts could we change or improve if we changed how the project was delivered?
3 What impacts could the element of society have on the project?
4 What benefits could we co-create if we work together to address impacts and challenges?
The initial questions are intended as only a first step. True co-creation cannot be achieved by one side of the relationship acting alone. It requires ongoing dialogue and interaction to create understanding and new ideas.
One model for co-creating value is the DART model,5 which we have adapted from a business model for working in developing economies. DART, which stands for Dialogue, Access, Risk Assessment, and Trust/Transparency, suggests that you need to focus on the four elements to fundamentally change СКАЧАТЬ