Integrating Sustainability Into Major Projects. Wayne McPhee
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Integrating Sustainability Into Major Projects - Wayne McPhee страница 13

СКАЧАТЬ can be a challenge for these projects because they will provide a public benefit for the public at large, and so project teams tend to assume that the broader and long-term benefits counterbalance the short-term construction pains. It is often assumed that public good will be sufficient to overcome the resistance of the people living closest to the facility. Developing strong sustainability programs for infrastructure can be important in avoiding a not-in-my-backyard (NIMBY) response from the local community.

      Linear infrastructure

      Linear infrastructure projects are a specific type where the facility is built to connect locations together, including:

       Roads, highways, and bridges

       Power lines

       Pipelines (water, sewage, oil)

       Rail lines

       Public transportation (subways, rapid transit)

      Energy Facilities

      Another type of infrastructure project is an energy facility that is used to create electricity for the grid or thermal energy for district heating, including:

       Thermal power plant (coal, oil, natural gas)

       Renewable energy (wind or solar farm)

       Hydroelectric facility

       Nuclear power plant

      Energy facilities have unique challenges related to location selection. There is a balance between putting the facility near the people who will use the energy but far enough away to mitigate impacts from the energy production. The selection of an ideal project location could look at the best location from an energy production perspective (close to water for cooling or best wind/ solar resource), minimization of energy transmission requirements, availability of local labor, environmental impacts, risk and disaster response, and climate resilience.

      Energy facility projects will often include a related linear infrastructure project, such as power lines. These further complicate the challenges of integrating sustainability. Like infrastructure projects, energy facility project teams need to keep in mind the difference between the overall benefit of the energy facility versus the local impacts to the environment and people living in the local community.

      Industrial Facilities

      The development of large industrial facilities has many of the same challenges as infrastructure projects but has the additional challenge in that the project is typically for the benefit of a corporation rather than a government project that will provide a public benefit. The wide range of industrial facilities include:

       Chemical plants

       Refineries

       Smelters

       Large manufacturing facilities

      Resource Extraction

      Resource extraction can include both nonrenewable and renewable resource projects where there is a large impact on the local community and environment, such as a new forestry development. Resource projects include:

       Mining and quarrying

       Off-shore oil and gas facilities

       On-shore oil and gas drilling and fracking

       Forestry

      Resource extraction projects have a number of unique challenges associated with the depletion of finite resources, royalties for access to the resources, and managing within the constraints of the location of the resource as opposed to being able to select a location for the facility. Project sites are often in remote areas where the potential for large impacts on the local community is high both from a positive perspective (jobs, skills development, and economic development) and from a negative perspective (social disruption, environmental damage, waste management, and impacts on health).

      Resource extraction projects often include their own infrastructure projects within the overall project such as pipelines, road and rail transport, marine ports, water treatment, power plants, waste disposal, and landfills. Resource extraction may also incorporate large industrial projects like mineral processing facilities at a mine site.

      Major projects are typically delivered by a large team of employees, external consultants, and contractors who work together to design and deliver the project. There are a variety of project structures that can be used to organize the team and manage who is responsible for which task.

      The “owner” (also called the proponent) of a major project is the organization that is ultimately responsibility for the successful delivery of the project and controls the project financials. The owner could be a government, a development agency, a corporation, a partnership, or a cooperative of organizations.

      The owner will decide on the project structure that is best suited for project delivery. Depending on the structure, the project team will span different organizations with varying goals and objectives. The project structure will have a significant impact on overall project success and will have a significant influence on how sustainability is managed and how successful it will be. There is no single answer, but each project structure will have advantages and disadvantages that need to be managed to create the most successful project.

       Self-perform

       Engineering, procurement, and construction management (EPCM)

       Engineer-procure-construct (EPC) or design-build

       Design-build-own-operate (DBOO)

       Design-finance-build-own-operate (DFBOO)

       Public-private partnership (P3)

       People-public-private СКАЧАТЬ