Skyrocket Your Teacher Coaching. Michael Cary Sonbert

Чтение книги онлайн.

      1

      BIG Ideas

      We are what we repeatedly do.

      Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.

      —Aristotle

      Imagine you decide, after years of wanting to learn how to play the piano, to hire a piano teacher and begin lessons. You start slowly, one key at a time, following your teacher’s lead. She hits a note. Then you hit the same one. She does it again. So do you. Soon you’re playing the easiest of all piano songs, “Chopsticks.” You’re slow, but you’re getting it, building confidence along the way. You’re thinking, I can do this. I’m playing piano. And then your teacher looks at you and says, “Now let’s work on some Tchaikovsky.”

      Likely, this would shock you. Or frustrate you. Confuse, anger, or disinvest you. If your teacher told you to play Tchaikovsky without first modeling what it looks like to play Tchaikovsky at a high level, that would likely disinvest you further. If her feedback felt random, not specific enough, or not actionable, or if it was absent altogether, you might want to give up. You might even think, I’ll tolerate the time I spend with this person, but really, I can’t wait for them to leave so I can go back to doing things my own way.

      Here’s the thing: it’s just not possible to become proficient at “Chopsticks” and Tchaikovsky at the same time, the same way it’s not possible to become proficient at giving clear directions and checking for understanding at the same time. It’s too much, and these tasks are too different.

      This is why the core belief behind the Skyrocket approach is that teachers should be coached where they are and not where you want them to be. That can be a challenge for school leaders who feel the urgency to “fix” everything at once, and it’s going to be a theme throughout this book.

      Our approach is a long-game approach. It’s about building foundational skills, and layering on top of them more and more advanced skills. This means no more training a teacher on writing objectives when they can’t get their students to stop talking, because even the most effective lesson, in the hands of a teacher who can’t get students’ attention, will fall flat. Also, the teacher will likely feel disheartened and may lose faith in their coach and, potentially, the students. A coach in this situation might even start to doubt themselves. And lower coach confidence often results in less directive and more general coaching—the same type of suggestion-based coaching I provided to teachers early in my career.

      Coaching teachers where they are does not mean we lower the bar. Certainly not. In fact, I’d argue Skyrocket is one of the most—if not the most—intense coaching models in education today, and the intensity and precision of our model will become evident as you read on. We train school leaders to land on a teacher’s highest-lever teacher action to increase student outcomes. After that, the leader designs and executes a practice session that will move the teacher forward immediately. Then the leader provides real-time coaching and follow-up support to ensure the teacher action sticks. (This three-step process—Ignition, Launch, and Orbit—has ample time dedicated to it in this book.)

      If you have designs on running a marathon, I wouldn’t train you by having you run an entire marathon on your first day. We’d have to build to that. That might be your end goal, but trying to do that on day one or in week one would be a formula for failure, just like asking the first-week piano student to play “Chopsticks” and Tchaikovsky in the same lesson. Without adequate support, success is even more difficult. That’s why leaders often find themselves having the same conversations with teachers in March that they were having in September. It’s too hard to provide feedback on, collect data on, or design practice for too many skills at once.

      I was in a school recently that had a schoolwide initiative around higher-order questioning. This seems like a reasonable thing for a school to be working on. We want students to engage with harder and harder material, and higher-order questioning is a great way to help get there. But as I began sitting in on coaching meetings and talking to teachers, many were so far away from being able to create the space for a higher-order question to even land with their students that it was largely a waste of time to provide them training on it. I shared this data and the school leaders agreed. They then decided to coach only a few teachers on higher-order questioning (as it was a logical next step for them), while coaching everyone else exactly where they were.

      What I’m suggesting is that, even if a schoolwide instructional focus is present, individual teachers are still coached—in the finite amount of time a coach has with a teacher—on the skill they personally need to work on to most increase student outcomes in their room.

      Right now, you may be thinking, how do we land on that thing? And how do we train on it? How do we ensure the teacher gets good and stays good at it? Our three-step process provides the answers for these three questions. But before we get there, I want to reiterate that core belief: Teachers should be coached where they are and not where you want them to be. Because to get them to where you want them to be, you need them to get really good where they are now.

      Now that we’ve discussed this core distinction in our approach, I think it’s СКАЧАТЬ