Evolution's Rainbow. Joan Roughgarden
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Evolution's Rainbow - Joan Roughgarden страница 8

Название: Evolution's Rainbow

Автор: Joan Roughgarden

Издательство: Ingram

Жанр: Биология

Серия:

isbn: 9780520957978

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ people turn to science, trying to use the biological criteria for male to define a man and the biological criteria for female to define a woman. However, the definition of social categories rests with society, not science, and social categories can’t be made to coincide with biological categories except by fiat.

      MALE AND FEMALE DEFINED

      Talk of gamete size may seem anticlimactic. Among humans, for example, centuries of poetry and art speak of strength and valor among men, matched by beauty and motherhood among women. Saying that the only essential difference between male and female is gamete size seems so trivial. The key point here is that “male” and “female” are biological categories, whereas “man” and “woman” are social categories. Poetry and art are about men and women, not males and females. Men and women differ in many social dimensions in addition to the biological dimension of gamete size.

      Yet, biologically, the gamete-size definition of “male” and “female” is far from anticlimactic. In fact, this definition is downright exciting. One could imagine species whose members all make gametes of the same size, or several gamete sizes—small, medium, and large—or a continuum of gamete sizes ranging from small to large. Are there any such species? Almost none. Some species of algae, fungi, and protozoans have gametes all the same size. Mating typically occurs only between individuals in genetic categories called “mating types.” Often there are more than two mating types.1 In these cases, sex takes place between the mating types, but the distinctions of male and female don’t apply because there is only one gamete size.2 By contrast, when gametes do come in more than one size, then there are generally only two sizes, one very small and the other very large. Multicellular organisms with three or more distinct gamete sizes are exceedingly rare, and none is known to have a continuum of gamete sizes.

      More than two gamete sizes occur in some colonial single-celled organisms, the protozoans. In the green ciliate Clamydomonas euchlora, the cells producing gametes may divide from four to sixty-four times. Four divisions result in relatively big gametes, whereas sixty-four divisions produce lots of small gametes. The cells that divide more than four times but less than sixty-four make various intermediate-sized gametes. Another ciliate, Pandorina, lives in colonies of sixteen cells. At reproduction, some cells divide into eight big gametes and others into sixteen small gametes. However, any two of these can fuse: two big ones, one big and one small, or two small ones.3 These species are at the borderline between single-celled and multicellular organisms.

      In the fruit fly Drosophila bifurca of the southwestern United States, the sperm is twenty (yes, twenty) times longer than the size of the male who made it! These sperm don’t come cheap. The testes that make these sperm comprise 11 percent of the adult male’s weight. The sperm take a long time to produce, and males take twice as long to mature as females. The sperm are so expensive that males conserve them, “offering” them to females in small amounts, leading to a one-to-one gamete ratio.4 So much for the vision of one huge egg surrounded by zillions of tiny sperm. Although giant sperm are a marvelous curiosity, the important finding is that some species of Drosophila have three sperm sizes—one giant type and two smaller varieties that overlap somewhat, totaling four gamete sizes (three sperm sizes plus one egg size). In Drosophila pseudoobscura from Tempe, Arizona, the tail of the big sperm is 1/3 millimeter long, and the tail lengths of the two small types are 1/10 and 1/20 millimeter.

      Female Drosophila in some species can store sperm for several days or even up to a month after mating. About one-third of the sperm are the giant type; the remaining two-thirds are small. Females preferentially store the large sperm, although some small sperm are stored too. Females also control which sperm are used for fertilization and preferentially select the large sperm. Whether the small sperm are ever used for fertilization has been hard to demonstrate. The amount of material in a large sperm is about one hundred times that of a small sperm. Therefore, to break even, the fertilization rate for small sperm needs to be only 1/100 of the fertilization rate of large sperm, and this low rate would be hard to detect.5

      If different individuals made the different-size gametes, we could have as many as four sexes in Drosophila, one for each gamete size. In this species, however, every male apparently makes all three of the sperm sizes in the same ratio, so all the males are apparently the same. If further research reveals that the sperm makers differ in the ratio of sperm sizes they produce, we will have discovered a species with more than two sexes. Such a discovery would not violate any law of nature, but it would be very rare and would certainly make headlines. So, for practical purposes, male and female are universal biological categories defined by a binary distinction between small and large gametes, sperm and egg.

      Why are two gamete sizes practically universal in sexually reproducing species? The current theory imagines a hypothetical species starting with two mating types that produce gametes of the same size. These gametes fuse with each other to produce a zygote, and each gamete contributes half the genes and half the cytoplasm needed by the zygote. Then the gamete in one of the mating types is hypothesized to evolve a smaller size to increase quantity while sacrificing quality. The gamete in the other mating type responds by evolving a larger gamete size to compensate for the lowered quality of the small gametes now being made by its counterpart. Overall, this back-and-forth evolutionary negotiation between the mating types with respect to gamete size culminates in one mating type making the tiniest gametes possible—gametes that provide genes and nothing else, whereas the other mating type makes gametes large enough to provide genes as well as all the cytoplasm the zygote needs to start life.6

      This little story of how the gamete binary originates is completely conjectural and untested, and points to the need for much further thought on such an important issue. This story also leaves unexplained why some groups, such as fungi, persist with only one gamete size, and why rare groups such as Drosophila occur with multiple sperm sizes.

      GENDER DEFINED

      Up to now, we’ve come up with two generalizations: (1) Most species reproduce sexually. (2) Among the species that do reproduce sexually, gamete size obeys a near-universal binary between very small (sperm) and large (egg), so that male and female can be defined biologically as the production of small and large gametes, respectively. Beyond these two generalizations, the generalizing stops and diversity begins!

      The binary in gamete size doesn’t extend outward. The biggest error of biology today is uncritically assuming that the gamete size binary implies a corresponding binary in body type, behavior, and life history. No binary governs the whole individuals who make gametes, who bring them to one another for fertilization, and who interact with one another to survive in a native social context. In fact, the very sexual process that maintains the rainbow of a species and facilitates long-term survival automatically brings a cornucopia of colorful sexual behaviors. Gender, unlike gamete size, is not limited to two.7

      “Gender” usually refers to the way a person expresses sexual identity in a cultural context. Gender reflects both the individual reaching out to cultural norms and society imposing its expectations on the individual. Gender is usually thought to be uniquely human—any species has sexes, but only people have genders. With your permission, though, I’d like to widen the meaning of gender to refer to nonhuman species as well. As a definition, I suggest: СКАЧАТЬ