Biofuel Cells. Группа авторов

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ as expected occurs at less negative potentials compared to MET (see Figure 1.10). The difference is, however, only of about 100 mV, small value compared to the difference in redox potentials between the ferricyanide and the FAD cofactor of the GDH (~300 mV). The authors attribute the high potential required for MET to the overpotential for FAD oxidation produced by the distance between the CNT and the enzyme active site. Polarization curves of complete cells sharing the same cathode (Figures 1.11e,f) are consistent with the cyclic voltammograms. A slightly higher OCV is obtained for the DET case, at the expense of current and, therefore, power. This example shows that each electron transfer mode has its advantages and disadvantages, and the most suitable strategy must be chosen in a case-by-case basis.

Figure 1.11 Comparison of direct and mediated electron transfer in electrodes containing glucose dehydrogenase. DET is achieved through the addition of carbon nanotubes while ferricyanide is used for MET. (a–d) Cyclic voltammetry of GDH anodes along with the respective negative controls. Black and red curves are in the absence and presence of glucose, respectively. (e–f) Polarization curves of fuel cells produced with the DET (e) and MET (f) anodes. Cathodes used Pt as catalyst. Reprinted with permission from (Ishida, K., Orihara, K., Muguruma, H., Iwasa, H., et al., Comparison of Direct and Mediated Electron Transfer in Electrodes with Novel Fungal Flavin Adenin Dinucleotide Glucose Dehydrogenase. Anal. Sci., 34, 783-787, 2018.). Copyright (2018) Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry.

      1.5.2 Microorganism-Electrode Electron Transfer

Electron transfer between microbial cells and solid materials has always occurred in the nature. This phenomenon was first investigated by the Lovley’s research group in microorganism-metal interactions, particularly species with Fe(III) reducing capability [152]. Electron transfer takes place in the cytoplasm of the cell for regular metabolic pathways. However, the phenomenon at the bacteria–electrode interface was differentiated and it named extracellular electron transfer (EET). EET is defined as the process in which the electrons derived from the oxidation of substrates, are transferred to the outer surface of the cell to reduce an extracellular terminal electron acceptor [153].

Similar to the classification of electron transfer phenomena already mentioned for enzymes, microbial EET has been grouped into direct (DET) and mediated transfer (MET) and is achieved by different structural molecules or via metabolites expelled by the cell. Table 1.3 shows a classification of the EET mechanisms recognized for electroactive bacteria.

      DET involves a physical contact between components of the cell membrane and the electrode; in this case the contact is maintained by an exo-polymeric matrix surrounding the cells. In the cases when the biofilm is not formed, EET is lower in comparison to bacteria in biofilm.

Outer membrane cytochrome complexes are present in different forms and depend on the electroactive species. In Geobacter various multihaem cytochromes, and multi-copper proteins have been identified. In Shewanella, redox reaction cascades from six multi-haem cytochrome complexes, mediate the EET (Table 1.4).

      Another DET mechanism is performed via pilus-like structures commonly named nanowires. These structures are observed in G. sulfurreducens and S. oneidensis. The appendages favor transfer of electrons through longer distances and even at a centimeter scale. EET between species has been described for anaerobic granules but this mechanism is also associated to interspecies EET in electroactive biofilms [160]. The proteins that participate in the electron transfer via pili-like structures are still being investigated; their identification presents difficulties because the bacteria produce a variety of filaments and not all of them seem to be conductive. The conductivity in the pili is attributed to the truncated PilA monomer; packed aromatic aminoacids form a path for conduction of electrons along the pili [161]. However, this mechanism seems not be predominant because only 80% of 95 species that have Fe(III) reducing capability lack electron-conducting pili genes [162].

Table 1.3 Mechanism for extracellular electron transfer at the interface microorganism-electrode. Direct electron transfer (DET), mediated electron transfer (MET).

Extracellular electron transfer
DET	MET
Membrane proteins	Primary metabolites
Pili structures	Secondary metabolites
Exo-polymeric matrix	Artificial redox mediators

Table 1.4 Types of proteins involved in the EET in Geobacter sp. and Shewanella sp.

Species	Type of protein	Location in the cell	Reference
Geobacter	ImcHCbcL	Cytoplasmic membrane	[154]
	PpcAPpcD	Periplasm	[155]
	Omas	Form the trans-outer membrane protein complex with the porin-like outer membrane proteins.	[156]
	Omcs
	OmbB
	OmbC
Shewanella	CymA	Cytoplasmic membrane	[157]
	Fcc3Small tetrahaem cytochrome	Periplasm	[158]
	MtrCBA	Outer membrane	[159]

      A mixed mechanism of EET comprises redox mediators embedded in the exo-polymeric matrix. The concentration and mobility of these molecules could contribute in some degree to the global electron transfer; however, this mechanism is not completely sustained by calculations of the electrical current produced from possible concentration of a mediator [163].

      MET via metabolites depends not only on the microbial species but the physiological state, growth phase and environmental conditions in which the СКАЧАТЬ