Mantle Convection and Surface Expressions. Группа авторов
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Mantle Convection and Surface Expressions - Группа авторов страница 20

Название: Mantle Convection and Surface Expressions

Автор: Группа авторов

Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited

Жанр: Физика

Серия:

isbn: 9781119528593

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ long‐wavelength divergence field does show a pattern of flow with centers of long‐wavelength convergence centered beneath the Western Pacific and beneath South America, where most of the net convergence is occurring. On the other hand, at 100 and 200 Ma, the pattern of long‐wavelength divergence is dominated by antipodal centers of divergence, ringed by convergence. The mid‐mantle structures seen in global tomographic models (Figure 1.2) closely resemble the long‐wavelength divergence field for 0 Ma, while the lowermost mantle structure is most correlated with the divergence field from 100 and 200 Ma (Figure 1.7). This analysis of the long wavelength components of convergence/divergence and the long‐wavelength mantle structure is consistent with analyses of the correlation between subduction history with mantle structure that include shorter wavelength structures (Wen and Anderson, 1995; Domeier et al., 2016). In particular, Domeier et al. (2016) found that the pattern of structure at 600–800 km depth is highly correlated with the pattern of subduction at 20–80 Ma. This suggests a straightforward interpretation of the changes in very long wavelength mantle structure, and the associated RCF, because the present‐day convergence has a distinctly different long‐wavelength pattern from the configuration of convergence at 50–100 Ma, and the mid‐mantle structure is dominated by the more recently subducted material. We note, however, that this explanation addresses only the seismically fast features and does not capture additional complexity associated with active upwellings.

Schematic illustration of divergence component of plate motions computed for 0, 100, and 200 Ma. In the top row, we show the divergence field up to spherical harmonic degree 40. Red colors indicate positive divergence (spreading) while blue colors indicate convergence. The second row shows only the spherical harmonic degree-1 component of the divergence field, which represents the net motion of the plates between antipodal centers of long-wavelength convergence and divergence. The third row shows the spherical harmonic degree-2 component of the divergence, and the bottom row shows the sum of degrees 1 and 2. The white diamonds in the bottom two rows indicate the locations of the degree-2 divergence maxima.

      In analyzing the changes in spectral content of tomographic models, we assume that the model spectral content is an accurate reflection of the true spectrum of mantle heterogeneity. A geodynamic study has suggested that there could be substantial aliasing from shorter to longer wavelengths due to model regularization, limited data sensitivities and theoretical assumptions (Schuberth et al., 2009), potentially influencing our inferences of spectral slopes in the transition zone. However, aliasing is likely to be very limited at the wavelengths considered here for three reasons. First, aliasing is expected to be small if the model parameterization is truncated at a spherical harmonic degree where the power spectrum has a rapid falloff with degree (e.g., Mégnin et al., 1997; Boschi and Dziewonski, 1999). Second, a recent model like S362ANI+M uses diverse observations – normal modes, body waves (S, SS, SS precursors), long‐period surface waves, and overtone waveforms – whose data variance are dominated by the longest wavelength components and show a clear falloff in power above a corner wave number (e.g., Su and Dziewonski, 1991, 1992; Masters et al., 1996). Third, we note that the spectral slope minimum in the lower part of the transition zone is recovered with models that employ various theoretical approximations.

      The geodynamic models all produce long‐wavelength structures that are quite similar to tomographic models at the surface and in the lowermost mantle, but there are some distinct differences in the mid‐mantle that arise from differences in the viscosity profiles and inclusion or omission of phase transitions. In Figure 1.4c, we show the correlation between each of the convection models and SEMUCB‐WM1 as a function of depth, for spherical harmonic degrees 1‐4. All of the models produce structures that are highly correlated with SEMUCB‐WM1 in the lithosphere and and lowermost mantle. The former is entirely expected because the lithospheric temperature structure is entirely determined by plate cooling in response to the imposed plate motions, which are well‐constrained for the recent past. Similar models have successfully predicted the long‐wavelength lowermost mantle structure, which is shaped largely by subduction history (e.g., McNamara and Zhong, 2005; Zhang et al., 2010). Recently, Mao and Zhong (2018; 2019) demonstrated that the inclusion of an endothermic phase transition at 660 km in combination with a low viscosity channel below the transition zone can produce slab behaviors consistent with tomographically imaged structures beneath many subduction zones.