Antenna and EM Modeling with MATLAB Antenna Toolbox. Sergey N. Makarov

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ coefficient values below −10 dB do not really matter, they are very sensitive to small variations of the antenna impedance around 50 Ω and are subject to noise.

      %% Setup analysis parameters f = linspace(200e6, 1200e6, 1000); % Frequency, Hz lA = 0.15; % Dipole total length, m a = 0.002; % Dipole radius, m %% Antenna toolbox model and analysis w = cylinder2strip(a); % Eq. strip width model d = dipole('Length',lA,'Width',w); % Strip dipole model figure; show(d) % Visualize geometry S11 = rfparam(sparameters(d,f,Rg),1,1); % Calculate s-parameters S11dB = 20*log10(abs(S11));

Figure 1.8 Magnitude of the reflection coefficient in dB for the dipole antenna and the antenna impedance bandwidth. Numerical solution is shown by a dashed curve.

In Figure 1.8, the antenna impedance bandwidth follows Eq. (1.32) or (1.34) with the minus 10 dB threshold. The threshold is shown by two dashed lines in Figure 1.8. The dipole antenna has the impedance bandwidth from the lower frequency of the band, f_L = 870.7 MHz, to the upper frequency of the band, f_U = 985.8 MHz (analytical solution is considered as an example). The center frequency of the band is given by

      (1.35)

      The antenna impedance bandwidth BW (or fractional bandwidth) is determined in the form

(1.36)

      which is a very typical value for a wire dipole or a thin‐blade dipole. Generally, we always want to increase the antenna bandwidth for a better throughput.

      Note:

Eq. (1.36) determines the bandwidth when it does not exceed 100%. For broadband antennas, the bandwidth is alternatively determined by the ratio of the upper‐to‐lower frequencies,

(1.37)

Both definitions may overlap. For example, if f_U = 1GHz, f_L = 500MHz, the antenna bandwidth according to Eq. (1.36) is 67% whereas the antenna bandwidth according to Eq. (1.37) is 2 : 1.

1.12 VSWR OF THE ANTENNA

      Along with the reflection coefficient Γ or S₁₁, another measurable quantity of significant interest is the voltage standing‐wave ratio or VSWR. On a transmission line connected to non‐matched antenna, both waves – incident and reflected V⁺ and V⁻, respectively – form a prominent standing wave. At every point in space, this standing wave has a certain amplitude as a sinusoidal function of time. The VSWR is given by the ratio of maximum and minimum standing wave amplitudes on the line. It may be shown that [1–3]

      (1.38a)

For the matched antenna, the VSWR is exactly one; for a non‐matched antenna, it is always greater than one, and may even approach infinity for a short‐ or open‐circuited antenna.

      The VSWR may be used instead of the reflection coefficient to determine and plot the impedance bandwidth. In this case, the criterion of

      (1.38b)

      corresponds to

      (1.38c)

      with a sufficient degree of accuracy.

      Example 1.11

      Plot the reflection coefficient in dB and VSWR for the dipole with l_A = 15 cm, a = 2 mm over the band 200–1200 MHz using Eq. (1.14) and MATLAB, and determine the antenna impedance bandwidth.

      Solution: We repeat the task of Example 1.5, but instead of the impedance plot, the reflection coefficient and the VSWR will be evaluated and plotted. Extra lines of the MATLAB code may be added such as

       c = figure; Rg = 50; RC =(Za-Rg)./(Za+Rg); temp = abs(RC); VSWR = (1 + temp)./(1 - temp); semilogy(f/1e6, VSWR, 'b', 'LineWidth', 2); grid on; xlabel ('frequency, MHz'); ylabel ('VSWR, a.u.'); title('VSWR');

The result is shown in Figure 1.9. The same antenna impedance bandwidth is marked on every plot – for the reflection coefficient and for the VSWR, respectively. In fact, the VSWR ≤ 2 bandwidth on the right plot is slightly greater than the |Γ|_dB ≤ − 10 dB bandwidth since, strictly speaking, the condition VSWR = 2 corresponds to |Γ|_dB = − 9.5 dB. This difference is usually ignored.

Figure 1.9 Reflection coefficient in dB (left) versus VSWR (right) for the same dipole antenna.

REFERENCES

      1 1. D. M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, Wiley, New York, 2011, fourth edition.

      2 2. T. A. Milligan, Modern Antenna Design, Wiley, New York, 2005, second edition, pp. 17–18.

      3 3. C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, Wiley, New York, 2016, fourth edition.

PROBLEMS

      1 1. An antenna withΖa = 100 ΩΖa = 100 Ω − j100 ΩΖa = 100 Ω + j100 Ωis directly connected to a generator with Rg = 50 Ω. Determine the reflection coefficient Γ of the antenna, its СКАЧАТЬ