Organic Electronics for Electrochromic Materials and Devices. Hong Meng
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Organic Electronics for Electrochromic Materials and Devices - Hong Meng страница 15

СКАЧАТЬ identically 95% and 99% of ΔTMmax corresponding to 3τ and 4.6τ.

      Therefore, for new EC materials, the same chronoabsorptometric responses [28] should be measured and fitted to the aforementioned function. From the fittings, the max values of ΔTMmax (the contrast corresponding to a full switch), the time constant τ, and the corresponding regression coefficient r2 will be obtained. Afterwards the switching time t90% or t95% will be easily calculated. This method allows an easy direct comparison between different reported values.

      1.3.3 Coloration Efficiency

      Coloration efficiency (CE) plays a fundamental role in the evaluation of the efficiency of charge utilization during the EC processes. It relates the optical absorbance change of an EC material at a given wavelength (ΔA) to the density of injected/ejected electrochemical charge necessary to induce a full switch (Qd). The higher CE value indicates a large transmittance change with a small amount of charge, which makes more effective use of the injected charge. CE value can be calculated using the following equation:

upper C upper E equals StartFraction upper Delta upper A Over upper Q Subscript d Baseline EndFraction equals StartStartFraction log left-parenthesis StartFraction upper T Subscript o x Baseline Over upper T Subscript neut Baseline EndFraction right-parenthesis OverOver upper Q Subscript d Baseline EndEndFraction Graph depicts the calculation of Qd.

      Source: Hsiao et al. [27].

Graph depicts the different types of CE value of the same EC materials.

      Source: Kraft [25].

      In addition, when insightfully considering the injected/ejected charge Qd, we can find it in fact to consist of three part: faradaic charge QF associated with doping/de‐doping, capacitive charge QC due to the capacitive nature of the ECD, and parasitic charge QP associated with electrolyte/impurity reactions. Among them, the faradaic charge is the source of redox activity leading to chromic change actually. Therefore, Fabretto et al. reported a new technique for measuring CE by extracting the faradaic charge from the total charge and calculated the only faradaic charge‐based CE value [29]. As we discussed, the total charge flow is simply the addition of the three individual charge flows and is given by

upper Q Subscript d Baseline equals upper Q Subscript upper F Baseline plus upper Q Subscript upper C Baseline plus upper Q Subscript upper P

      where the parasitic current was a small component (approximately <2%) compared with the other two and therefore can be ignored. Then the time–evolution total current flow can be described as following:

upper I Subscript d Baseline left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis equals upper I Subscript upper F Baseline left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis plus upper I Subscript upper C Baseline left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis equals StartFraction n upper F upper A normal upper C 0 upper D Superscript 1 slash 2 Baseline Over pi EndFraction t Superscript negative 1 slash 2 Baseline plus upper I 0 normal e Superscript negative t slash upper R upper C Baseline equals k t Superscript negative 1 slash 2 Baseline plus upper I 0 normal e Superscript negative t slash upper R upper C

      where n is the number of electrons transferred per molecule, F is the Faraday constant (96 500 C/mol), A is the electrode area (cm2), C0 is the concentration of species in the bulk solution (mol/cm3), D is the apparent diffusion coefficient (cm2/s), t is time in seconds, I0 is the maximum current flow at t = 0, R is the cell resistance, and C is the double layer capacitance. Then fitting the experimental data to this equation and substituting the constant k, at last, a plot of the time–evolution faradaic current will be obtained, and the corresponding faradic‐corrected CEs can be calculated. Usually, the faradic‐corrected CEs are larger than the uncorrected results, because the total charge ingress/egress (i.e. Qd) is larger than the faradic charge (i.e. QF).

      1.3.4 Optical Memory

Graphs depict the open-circuit memory tests of PBOTT-BTD spray coated on an ITO-coated glass slide in 0.1 M TBAPF6/ACN at 423 nm: (a) short- and (b) long-term performance.