Chemistry and Biology of Non-canonical Nucleic Acids. Naoki Sugimoto

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ Introduction

      This book is to interpret the non-canonical structures and their stabilities of nucleic acids from the viewpoint of the chemistry and study their biological significances. There is more than 60 years' history after the discovery of the double helix DNA structure by James Dewey Watson and Francis Harry Compton Crick in 1953, and chemical biology of nucleic acids is facing a new aspect today. Through this book, I expect that readers understand how the uncommon structure of nucleic acids became one of the common structures that fascinate us now. In this chapter, I introduce the history of nucleic acid structures and the perspective of research for non-canonical nucleic acid structures (see also Chapter 15).

1.2 History of Duplex

The opening of the history of genetics was mainly done by three researchers. Charles Robert Darwin, who was a scientist of natural science, pioneered genetics. The proposition of genetic concept is indicated in his book On the Origin of Species published in 1859. He indicated the theory of biological evolution, which is the basic scientific hypothesis of natural diversity. In other words, he proposed biological evolution, which changed among individuals by adapting to the environment and be passed on to the next generation. However, that was still a primitive idea for the genetic concept. After that, Gregor Johann Mendel, who was a priest in Brno, Czech Republic, confirmed the mechanism of gene evolution by using “factor” inherited from parent to children using pea plant in 1865. This discovery became the concept of genetics. At the almost same time in 1869 as Mendel, Johannes Friedrich Miescher, who was a biochemist in Swiss, discovered nucleic acids as a chemical substance of the gene identity. He named it “nuclein” (later, it was named “nucleic acid,” which exists acidic substance in nucleus) and made the opportunity to study nucleic acid chemistry. However, it would be doubtful if he realized that nucleic acid is the gene identity. After that, it was needed to take a lot of time to conclude that the gene identity is proved the chemical substance.

      Charles Robert Darwin (left), Gregor Johann Mendel (middle), and Johannes Friedrich Miescher (right)

Erwin Rudolf Josef Alexander Schrödinger, who was a great physicist, pioneered to go after the mystery of gene. He published a book titled What Is Life? in 1944 [1]. This book invited the study of the gene to many researchers. He mentioned in the book that he believed a gene – or perhaps the whole chromosome fiber – to be an aperiodic solid, although he also mentioned that gene is probably one big protein molecule. After the 1950s, chemistry regarding nucleic acids had been developing. One of the organic chemists was Erwin Chargaff, who was a professor at Colombia University in the United States and born in Austria. He discovered that from the result of paper chromatography targeted to the different types of DNA, the number of guanine units equals the number of cytosine units and the number of adenine units equals the number of thymine units [2]. It is called Chargaff's rules. On the other hand, analysis of the superstructure of nucleic acids was also proceeding. At the beginning of the 1950s, at King's College London, the results of X-ray crystal analysis were accumulated by Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins, Rosalind Elsie Franklin, and others. Finally, based on their result, Watson and Crick who worked at Cavendish Laboratory in Cambridge and proposed the model of double helix structure of DNA (Figure 1.1 and see Chapter 2), published as a single-page paper about DNA double helix in Nature issued on 25 April 1953 [3]. By discovering DNA double helix structure, Watson, Crick, and Wilkins were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1962.

Figure 1.1 The diffraction pattern of the canonical DNA duplex and its chemical structure.

      Source: Kings College London.

Erwin Rudolf Josef Alexander Schrödinger (left) and Erwin Chargaff (right)Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins (left) and Rosalind Elsie Franklin (right)James Dewey Watson and Francis Harry Compton Crick

1.3 Non-Watson–Crick Base Pair

Although the discovery of Watson–Crick base pairs is famous, we need to make sure that Watson and Crick initially “proposed” their model. Moreover, Watson and Crick were not the first researchers who proposed the structure of nucleic acids. The physicist Linus Pauling, who earned the Nobel Prize two times in his career, first proposed the helix model of nucleic acids with his associate Robert Corey [4]. However, the structure was fault: it was a triple helix having negatively charged phosphates located at the core of the helix, which could not exist in nature. After the proposal of Watson–Crick base pairs, the race for determination of the helical structure of DNA had been started using purine and pyrimidine monomers. The first such study was reported in 1959, when Karst Hoogsteen – an associate of Robert Corey at Caltech – used single-crystal X-ray analysis to determine the structures of cocrystals containing 9-methyladenine and 1-methylthymine, where methyl groups were used to block hydrogen bonding to nitrogen atoms otherwise bonded to sugar carbons in DNA [5]. However, the structure was NOT Watson–Crick base pair, in which the adenine base was flipped upside down. The different base pair was later named Hoogsteen base pair (Figure 1.2 and see Chapter 2). After the discovery of Hoogsteen base pairs, many researchers looked for Watson–Crick base pairs. However, only Hoogsteen base pairs were identified. In 1973, Alexander Rich first discovered Watson–Crick base pairs in the cocrystal of the AU and GC dinucleoside phosphate complex [6]. And soon after, Richard E. Dickerson, who took over the Pauling's lab, first solved the single-crystal structure of a DNA dodecamer using heavy atom X-ray crystallography in 1980 [7]. It takes more than 20 years after the discovery of Watson–Crick base pairs. These results suggest that Watson–Crick base pairs tended to stably form under the constraint of the helical structure of nucleic acids, whereas Hoogsteen base pairs form in other structural conditions. Therefore, there are canonical structures composed by Watson–Crick base pairs in the duplex structures. On the other hand, non-canonical structures include non-Watson–Crick base pairs such as Hoogsteen base pairs.

Figure 1.2 Chemical structures of base pairs via Watson–Crick or Hoogsteen types.

      Linus Pauling (left), Robert Corey (middle), and Karst Hoogsteen (right)Alexander Rich (left) and СКАЧАТЬ