Deconstruction Is/In America. Anselm Haverkamp
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Deconstruction Is/In America - Anselm Haverkamp страница 6
Название: Deconstruction Is/In America
Автор: Anselm Haverkamp
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Зарубежная публицистика
isbn: 9780814773161
isbn:
Notes
1. The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man, eds. Richard Macksey, Eugenio Donato (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1970), notably Jacques Derrida’s closing remarks, following his intervention on “Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences,” pp. 270–272.
2. Jacques Derrida, “The Politics of Friendship,” as read at the 85th annual meeting of the American Philosophical Association, Eastern Division, in December 1988, Journal of Philosophy 85 (1988), pp.632–645.
3. Barbara Johnson, A World of Difference (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987), p.15.
4. Jacques Derrida, Memoires for Paul de Man (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), p.18.
5. Stanley Cavell, This New Yet Unapproachable America (Albuquerque: Living Batch Press, 1989), p.91.
6. See, most prominently, Stanley Fish, Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies (Durham: Duke University Press, 1989), p.342.
7. Richard Rorty, “The Priority of Democracy to Philosophy,” in Objectivism, Relativism, and Truth—Philosophical Papers I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), p.175.
8. Richard Rorty, “Philosophy as a Kind of Writing: An Essay on Derrida,” Consequences of Pragmatism (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982), pp.90, 109.
9. See, paradigmatically, Jacques Derrida, “Force de Loi” (The Force of Law), Cardozo Law Review 11 (1990), pp.919–1045.
10. See, paradigmatically, Stanley Cavell, Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1990), p. 102.
11. Cornel West, Afterword, Post-Analytic Philosophy, eds. John Rajchman, Cornel West (New York: Columbia University Press, 1985), p.267.
12. See, for instance, Philip Fisher, “Introduction,” The New American Studies (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991), pp.xxi–ii.
13. Stanley Cavell, “Naughty Orators,” Languages of the Unsayable, eds. Sanford Budick, Wolfgang Iser (New York: Columbia University Press, 1989), p.365.
14. Jacques Derrida, “Toward an Ethic of Discussion,” Afterword, Limited Inc (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1988), pp.133, 148 (159.16).
15. See, most recently, Richard Shusterman, Pragmatist Aesthetics: Living Beauty, Rethinking Art (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992), p.246.
16. Stanley Cavell, Disowning Knowledge in Six Plays of Shakespeare (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp.39, 138.
17. See, most recently, Gary Wihl, The Contingency of Theory: Pragmatism, Expressivism, and Deconstruction (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994), p. 182.
18. See, paradigmatically, Shoshana Felman, “Rereading Femininity,” Yale French Studies 62 (1981), pp. 19–44.
19. Jacques Derrida, Given Time: I. Counterfeit Money, trans. Peggy Kamuf (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1992), p.29.
20. Jacques Derrida, The Other Heading: Reflections on Today’s Europe, trans. Pascale-Anne Brault, Michael Naas (Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 1992), pp.8–9.
21. Stanley Cavell, The Senses of Walden, (Chicago: Chicago University Press, expanded edition 1992), p. 138.
22. See, most pointedly, Thomas McCarthy, “The Politics of the Ineffable: Derrida’s Deconstructionism,” The Philosophical Forum 21 (1989/90), pp.160; 146–168.
23. Jacques Derrida, Donner la mort, trans. David Wills (Chicago: Chicago University Press, forthcoming).
24. Rodolphe Gasché, “On Critique, Hypercriticism, and Deconstruction,” Cardozo Law Review 13 (1991), pp.1115–1132.
25. On Paris is Burning see Barbara Vinken, Mode nach der Mode (Frankfurt/M: Fischer, 1993), pp.45–47; Judith Butler, Bodies That Matter (New York: Routledge, 1993), pp.129–137.
The Time is Out of Joint
Jacques Derrida
“So long? ...”
(Hamlet)
I
Forgive me for thanking you in my language. I am very grateful to you, in the first place, for allowing the foreigner here at New York University—and this is hospitality itself, with which you are unstinting—to thank you in his language. To thank you all, and especially the two friends and colleagues who had the fortunate idea of this colloquium, Tom Bishop and Anselm Haverkamp.
I thank them in my name, of course, since they have done me the honor of confiding this perilous task to me: to address to the experts and the redoubtable readers that you are, a key word, a keynote, at the halfway point, right in the middle of the colloquium, at the very time when the colloquium seems to pivot on itself. Like time, like deconstruction perhaps, like a door on its hinges, our colloquium would turn in this way, and folding back on itself, it would also bend to and obey itself, without the least certainty.
As for deconstruction, СКАЧАТЬ