Название: Bats of Southern and Central Africa
Автор: Ara Monadjem
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Биология
isbn: 9781776145843
isbn:
Figure 38. A spectrogram depicting a HD-CF call: the frequency in kilohertz (kHz) is shown on the vertical axis and the time in milliseconds (ms) on the horizontal. Colours represent amplitude (‘loudness’) in decibels; darker colours depict the louder components of the call.
BAT DETECTORS
The transformation of ultrasound into a signal audible to human ears requires the use of specialised bat detectors, of which there are three main types. Advances in digital technology have completely revolutionised the means available to study bat sonar today, even compared to three decades ago. Thus, the pioneering work by M. B. Fenton and colleagues in southern Africa (e.g. Fenton et al. 1977, Fenton and Bell 1981) required heavy, expensive analog equipment, particularly to record ultrasonic calls (Kunz 1988). While the best of the modern digital bat detectors, coupled with powerful laptop computers, are still relatively costly, they are much more affordable to researchers. More compact digital ultrasonic detectors have radically lowered the costs of functional bat detectors, which has opened up their affordability to non-specialist enthusiasts to survey bats.
Heterodyne detectors convert bat calls into electronic signals, which are then compared to an internal signal of a particular frequency. The internal frequencies of detectors are ‘tunable’ so that the bat’s actual peak frequency can be estimated within a limited band of frequencies, usually 10 kHz. Two disadvantages of this system are that bat passes can be missed because the full range of possible echolocation frequencies used by bats (e.g. between 10 and 214 kHz in southern Africa) has to be scanned ∼10 kHz at a time, and bandwidth information is lost. Advantages of heterodyne detectors are that they work in real time, are easy to use, and are the least expensive. In fact, in Europe, heterodyne detectors such as the Magenta, Maplin, and Batbox III are very popular among the public and scientists for basic field identification of species and the monitoring of bat activity, because calls of local species are increasingly well known.
Frequency division detectors digitally scale down the entire ultrasonic frequency range of a bat call into the human hearing range. This is done by converting the call into a square wave, called a zero-crossing signal. The square wave is divided by a constant factor, usually 10, meaning that a frequency of 50 kHz will be converted to 5 kHz. In other words, frequency division detectors count the number of cycles of the ultrasonic signal (N), and effectively divide the frequency by N, where N is usually 10. Frequency division detectors are only capable of tracking one frequency (harmonic) at a time. Usually this is the fundamental frequency. Consequently, it is difficult to perform a harmonic analysis from a frequency division signal. Advantages of frequency division detectors are that they are reasonably priced, work in real time and cover a broad bandwidth, in other words, all of the ultrasonic frequencies of co-existing bats are recorded, without missing frequencies of species because of tuning choices. Because some scientists use the ANABAT frequency division bat detector (Titley Electronics, Australia) to identify bat species and monitor bat activity (but see Fenton et al. 2001), echolocation data of southern African bat species that were recorded by the authors with the ANABAT system are presented in Table 3.
TABLE 3.
TABLE 3. Anabat call data, listing the mean (± standard deviation) echolocation parameters of 29 bat species caught in southern africaRecordings were made with anabat bat detectors and analysed with analook software. n = number of bats in sample; fc = characteristic frequency, the frequency at the end or flattest portion of the call; fk = frequency at the ‘knee’ or the point at which the slope of the call abruptly changes from a downward slope to a more level slope; fmin = minimum call frequency; fmax = maximum frequency; dur = total duration of the call; tc = time from the start of the call to fc; tk = time from the start of the call to fk.
SPECIES | N | FMAX | FMIN | FC | FK | DUR | TC | TK |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIPPOSIDERIDAE | ||||||||
Hipposideros caffer | 6 | 143.8±1.1 | 125.5±13.2 | 142.6±1.2 | 142.3±1.5 | 4.5±0.5 | 3.2±0.3 | 0.9±0.5 |
Hipposideros ruber | 4 | 136.6±2.7 | 106.9±21.2 | 136.3±2.9 | 135.8±2.9 | 4.8±0.5 | 3.9±0.8 | 1.1±1.5 |
Macronycteris vittatus | 2 | 65.3±1.9 | 57.9±0.4 | 64.5±1.7 | 64.9±2.1 | 9.5±1.3 | 7.6±1.8 | 0.4±0.07 |
RHINONYCTERIDAE | ||||||||
Cloeotis percivali | 4 | 103.2±0.7 | 99.4±4.3 | 102.4±0.7 | 103.1±0.8 | 1.9±0.6 | 1.6±0.3 | 0 |
Triaenops afer | 15 | 77.5±5.5 | 67.4±5.3 | 77.1±5.6 | 77.0±5.5 | 8.8±3.2 | 7.2±2.5 | 0.4±0.6 |
RHINOLOPHIDAE | ||||||||
Rhinolophus blasii | 3 | 86.6±0.2 | 77.3±0.9 | 86.0±0.3 | 86.3±0.4 | 20.6±0.1 | 19.3±1.8 | 2.2±0.4 |
Rhinolophus clivosus | 7 | 90.8±1.2 | 76.4±6.1 | 89.6±2.2 | 89.9±1.78 | 29.7±7.9 | 25.7±7.7 | 2.9±2.3 |
Rhinolophus darlingi | 4 | 85.6±0.2 | 72.2±3.9 |
СКАЧАТЬ
|