Group Text A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Group Text A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk страница 5

Название: Group Text A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition

Автор: Gerardus Blokdyk

Издательство: Ingram

Жанр: Зарубежная деловая литература

Серия:

isbn: 9781867461197

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ Score

      77. Is it needed?

      <--- Score

      78. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?

      <--- Score

      79. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?

      <--- Score

      80. How are you going to measure success?

      <--- Score

      81. What creative shifts do you need to take?

      <--- Score

      82. Does your organization need more Group text education?

      <--- Score

      83. Where is training needed?

      <--- Score

      84. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?

      <--- Score

      85. Who should resolve the Group text issues?

      <--- Score

      86. What Group text coordination do you need?

      <--- Score

      87. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Group text leader?

      <--- Score

      88. What are the clients issues and concerns?

      <--- Score

      89. Who needs what information?

      <--- Score

      90. What is the problem or issue?

      <--- Score

      91. What extra resources will you need?

      <--- Score

      92. Which needs are not included or involved?

      <--- Score

      93. Who else hopes to benefit from it?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Group text Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

      INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. Are the Group text requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      2. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      3. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      4. What Group text services do you require?

      <--- Score

      5. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      6. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      7. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Group text leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      8. Is Group text currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      9. When is/was the Group text start date?

      <--- Score

      10. How are consistent Group text definitions important?

      <--- Score

      11. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      12. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      13. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      14. How do you catch Group text definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      15. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      16. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      17. What is the scope of the Group text work?

      <--- Score

      18. Is Group text linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      19. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      20. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      21. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      22. Who is gathering Group text information?

      <--- Score

      23. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      24. СКАЧАТЬ