Timeline Analog 5. John Buck
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Timeline Analog 5 - John Buck страница 8

Название: Timeline Analog 5

Автор: John Buck

Издательство: Ingram

Жанр: Изобразительное искусство, фотография

Серия: Timeline Analog

isbn: 9781925330250

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ it may be included in the future as Apple adds machine-control features to QuickTime.

      Software specialist Loran Kary had seen ReelTime at SuperMac.

       Adobe Premiere Version 1 was a pretty basic program because it could not control videotape machines or laserdiscs to perform actual timecode video editing. With a lack of support for timecode and no EDL support, you couldn't really perform off-line editing.

       You had no way of taking an edit to an on-line bay. In fact, I can't remember how you even got material onto the drives! It didn't even have digitising capabilities.

      The shipping Premiere product may not have been considered a threat to professional systems made by Avid and EMC but it caused problems elsewhere. VP of sales and marketing at Digital F/X.

      Roger Siminoff remembers:

       Its impact was immediate. Here was Digital F/X in a last ditch effort to stay alive and trying to compete at a $10,000 price point, down from $100,000 for the original Composium and at the turn of a light switch, at the very same show suddenly it was competing with a bundle of Adobe Premiere for $495 and a Radius card.

       You could get a whole system for $8000, promising to do the same thing as Video F/X. Adobe also had great digital imaging products like Illustrator and Photoshop, and it completely blew the chair out from under Digital F/X.

      Digital F/X’s Michael Olivier adds:

       No doubt Premiere Version One was a groundbreaking product at the time, but no professional editors in those days would consider using Premiere. It was a “prosumer” offering: great for enthusiasts on a budget but terrible for 500+ cuts a day editing.

      SuperMac VP Laurin Herr looks back:

       Was Premiere like Avid? No. Did it offer the editor the same versatility and creative vocabulary and productivity as an Avid? No. Randy Ubillos is a brilliant programmer, but he wasn't an editor.

       He had created a new working environment based upon the metaphor he knew well and understood, and that was desktop publishing. Quark, Photoshop and Postscript. He took a different approach, a different metaphor that was brilliant.

      Despite the shortcomings for professional editors, Premiere's early adopters were desktop workers, and they loved it. Editor Junior Hansen from the Berkeley Macintosh Users Group was a typical user, amazed at the power that editors now had.

       Premiere 1.0 was a visionary Mac application and remains so, even to this day. I'm sure the first cave woman felt the same about fire, once she was able to harness it for soufflés. I had the opportunity to work with a beta version in the ‘early days’ when the idea of dynamic data was just an exciting secret soon to be told, it was instantly intuitive.

       The metaphors of film and video editing were employed and recognizable within the interface.

      In homage to the days of slicing through film strips and then videotape, Ubillos had included icon design that matched a film editor’s toolset. Hansen Jr concludes:

       Tools and objects are representative of their function; a QuickTime movie looks like a strip of film, a razor blade tools cuts just as it would in the real world.

       EDDY AWARDS

      The potential that Randy Ubillos had unleashed with ReelTime then Premiere was profound and it did not go unnoticed. The 8th MacWorld Editors' Choice Award (Eddy) voting committee decided to make an exception in 1992 and award its Eddy statue in two categories.

      The Lifetime achievement went to Adobe founders Chuck Geschke and John Warnock and at the other end of innovation, the Rising Star Award went to Randy Ubillos.

      The focus of software development moved from print publishing to video publishing. MacWorld also recognized one of the key participants in the upcoming revolution.

      Ubillos recalls:

       I was at the reception for the awards and it was the first time that I met (Charles) Geschke and (John) Warnock. Although we were seated at the same table, it was all pretty overwhelming.

      Programmer Nick Schlott recalls reading the Eddy announcement:

       Here’s the thing, they had never awarded the Eddy to a person before, so it was obvious that Randy was a one in a million programmer but there is also the fact that there hasn’t been another individual award since!

       I remember thinking, “That is very cool. He gets an award for being Randy Ubillos.”

      Product manager Tim Myers recalls the next stages for Premiere.

       Randy and I were left to ourselves with ReelTime for quite a while. We had some support people working for us on and off but other than that, two of us! There was little or no expectation on us to be the ‘next big thing’ necessarily but that was how Adobe was back then.

       Nobody expected Photoshop to be as big as it is now, Adobe didn’t even acquire it the first time it was offered to them and so their expectation of ReelTime and Premiere was, I guess the same. If you look back at what was important at the time it was Raster Graphics or Bitmaps. Video was still to come.

       For the senior executives at Adobe it was a nice way to round out the spread of products, but I honestly don’t think they took it as seriously, as say Illustrator.

       AVID VS MONTAGE

      Just like Ediflex, TouchVision and EditDroid before it, Avid’s future depended on film editors. Variety magazine's review opened with:

       Novice writer-director Ron Senkowski offers some mildly amusing evidence that he’s good for a few laughs in “Let’s Kill All the Lawyers”. Small-budget Michigan-filmed effort won’t generate much B.O. coin, but may find a few advocates on home video and cable.

      “Let’s Kill All the Lawyers” became the first feature-length film to be edited using a Macintosh controlled Avid system. Seen here are writer Senkowski, director Christa Kindt, editor and producer Shannon Hamed.

      Editor Steve Cohen worked with director Martha Coolidge.

       Martha was eager to try new editing tools and we used the newest Montage to cut “Crazy in Love” for her. This was a hybrid of their standard tape-based system together with an “18th drive,” which was a PC with seven SCSI disks attached. We were one of only two shows to ever use it, a Rube Goldberg machine if there ever was one.

       The drives were full-height and held a whopping 600 megabytes, an enormous amount in those days. They weren’t even in cases, and they had to be switched every time we changed acts. You’d work all day on the СКАЧАТЬ