Seahorse. Janice Pariat
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Seahorse - Janice Pariat страница 3

Название: Seahorse

Автор: Janice Pariat

Издательство: Ingram

Жанр: Современная зарубежная литература

Серия:

isbn: 9781939419675

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ map on the wall flickered, replaced by the image of a stone figure, fractured and antique. “One of many works that French historian Alfred Foucher acquired on his expeditions to Shahbazgarhi between 1895 and 1897…”

      The figure was decked in the accoutrements of religious ritual—robes, fluid as real cloth, twisted around a slender waist, falling to slippered feet. Carved ornaments crossed its bare torso, and its turbaned head was framed by a full-moon halo.

      “We tend to decipher figurative sculpture instinctively… employing a tool we use everyday… subconsciously perhaps, but, in fact, almost all the time in our waking lives.”

      The speaker stepped closer to his audience. “Can anyone tell me what it’s called? The study of body language…”

      “Kinesthetics.” It was Adheer, a final-year history student. With a pale, artistic face, and, even though he was no more than twenty, peppery grey hair.

      “That’s right… you may have heard this before, that figurative sculpture aspires to one thing—to arrest the body and capture life. True, but not always.”

      He turned, appraising the image.

      “Scientifically, we may determine Foucher’s bodhisattava is over a thousand years old… carved in light grey-blue schist, from an area now in northern Pakistan… But how would you read him?”

      A few observations were proffered—the figure was serene, princely, in prayer, the right hand raised in blessing.

      “All accurate, no doubt, but at the heart of it, the key to truly unlocking an image is iconography… it comes from the Greek eikón, “image” and grafein, “to write”. If literature depends on the slower rhythm of the word, iconography relies on the swifter rhythm of the eye. The artist takes an elaborate temporal succession of events, and condenses them into an image… it holds everything.”

      Each element, from the flaming halo down to the carved base, served as a clue.

      “The bodhisattva’s hand, for instance, is fixed in abhaya mudra, a gesture of fearlessness. And this,” he pointed to the fingers, which—I hadn’t noticed—were webbed, “is not an amphibian motif, but an indication, some say, of supernatural power. If you look carefully at his turban, you’ll see it contains a small figurine… of Garuda, a mythical bird-like creature, carrying a naga.”

      “Why is that?” asked Adheer.

      The speaker shrugged. “The motif is most likely related to a Greek myth… the abduction of Ganymede by Zeus in the form of an eagle. It appears widely in ancient south Asian art, but in this context its significance remains a mystery.”

      I remember, at the end of the talk, I waited while the hall emptied, flooded with stark-white tube light. The speaker glanced around the room and I wondered whether he saw me—slouching in the corner in my faded jeans and t-shirt. He stashed away his papers in an old-fashioned briefcase, and joined a professor waiting by the door. They headed out. I caught snatches of conversation. Laughter. Someone flicked the lights off and once again the room sank back into watery darkness.

      Later, I saw a poster pinned on the college notice board announcing—like a prophet of the past—the event I’d accidentally attended. Organized by the Department of History. A talk by art historian Doctor Nicholas Petrou.

      While Nicholas was an art historian, Lenny was the artist.

      Or so I like to believe, even if it probably isn’t a label he’d have claimed for himself. In our hometown, as in hundreds of small towns in India in the late 1980s, there was little room for the imaginative and abstract. The elusive and intangible. Our options indelectably confined to medicine, engineering, or government service—safe, sturdy careers, long, narrow ladders leading to a future ostensibly improved. A quest always for security, hardly for meaning—or what the Greeks called eudaimonia, a human flourishing—and, especially within the puritanical Christian circles our families moved in, rarely for enjoyment. Lenny wasn’t devoted to an artistic profession, but I remember how effortlessly creativity alighted on him, the startling deftness of his hands. He’d sketch portraits of strangers while sitting at roadside teashops, on scraps of paper and napkins. A quick, light touch, each one taking him less than a minute. Or fold paper into birds, which he’d place along his window sill, longing for the sky. Strum the guitar, casual and easy, singing low and tuneful.

      A month ago, I was at the National Portrait Gallery in London, for a retrospective on Lucian Freud. The man who only painted portraits. Room after room of faces, distraught, humiliated, indifferent, tenderly in love. A lifetime spent in attempting to capture all of humanity—its myths and frailties—with unrelenting intensity. I followed the eyes, and the eyes followed me. Paintings are always once removed, but not on this occasion. Each canvas raw and visceral. Turned to skin, loose, marked and scarred.

      The people he painted, he took their soul.

      There’s a sketch Lenny sent me before he died that looks as though it could have been drawn by Lucian Freud. That’s why I like to believe he’s an artist, and that if he’d lived longer, perhaps he’d have come to realize it too.

      Instead, he was enrolled, through his parents’ persistent coercion, in a science degree—zoology? biology?—in a college in our hometown. Except, I never saw him attend class, or complete assignments, or venture near an academic building of any sort. He did what all parents found impossibly infuriating—he drifted.

      I knew Lenny all my life. We grew up in the same neighborhood, although he was older and we became friends much later, when I was fourteen. Unexpectedly, at the side of a basketball court. One of those dilapidated public sports grounds where youngsters congregated in the evening for lack of anything else to do. Mostly, I hovered around the edges, invisible, pretending to follow the match, watching the big boys play, the ones who jumped like they had wings on their feet.

      One day, Lenny showed up and declared it the silliest game he’d ever seen.

      “Is this what you do?” he asked. “Sit around watching these guys fight over an orange ball?”

      “Sometimes.”

      “Do you play?”

      I thought it pointless to lie. “No.”

      He lit a cigarette, and threw his head back. His face pieced together by an irreverent sculptor—an uneven nose, slanting eyes, a rough chin, and sharp plane cheeks. He smelled of smoke and pine forests, of something wild and unexplored.

      He said nothing until he’d finished the cigarette, until he threw it to the ground and it flickered and died, burning itself out.

      “Come.”

      And I followed.

      Before Lenny, I was unattuned to much else apart from my parents’ precise clockwork regime. Weekdays stretched taut between school and homework, punctuated by weekend visits to my grandparents, and church service on Sunday. When I was with him, though, time dissolved into insignificance. It lost its grasp, and loosened, unfurling endlessly as the sea. He’d rent VHS tapes from a movie parlor in town, and watch one after another—it didn’t occur to him to stop if it was late, or dawn. Or he’d walk, for hours, winding his way to unfamiliar neighborhoods on the other side of town. Often, he’d ride his old motorbike СКАЧАТЬ