The RIP. James Bèyor

Чтение книги онлайн.

      II

      VOLITION

      Will Given Over to Word Manipulation

      Who overcomes

      By force, hath overcome

      but half his foe.

      —John Milton, Paradise Lost

      DOES THE HUMAN BEING HAVE FREE WILL?

      No; not unless he or she is removed from the truth that is connected within the agreement process. All other truths, being subjective, lie accountable to the self in periphery side effects: truth that is accountable to truth is no truth at all. The befuddled mind that is said to govern free will is reliant upon no self will at all. The befuddled and overburdened mind cannot, in one sitting, differentiate between rules and laws designed for blame, as the preclusion of free will and the intrinsic self that is the catalyst and crucible of free will and free range of thought.

      Those who deny will in favor of an entity of we are favored partners in a protective agreement process designed and failsafed to de-authorize anyone who is not in synchronization with the boundary called impasse, the last reason held. Paradox must exist in impasse and it must insist upon the non-will of the many; utilizing a few elaborate and mundane devices built into a scheme that promises order through disorder. The failsafe in mass agreement is that there is no legitimate self-blame; for that is shrugged off as an impossibility, due to the forward of now mental state: intent. Future is not held accountable; for its motive is postulated as good; and good is not made responsible. All that is not good is tagged, by entity, as uncommitted promise that is not formidable.

      Progress, the stratagem that allows knowledge to hold sanctified reign over feeling, is, in light of that which is self, absurd and made idiotic by mass appeal for anything that can convey solid, mechanical truths, placed in noun/verb formats. Progress aligns itself with agreement that, the good of the group, is the right of the group to oversee, empower and protect the forward leaning truth; which both receives and sanctions itself. Progress is group agreement to do whatever is necessary to insure right over all claims to the truth of this social intention. Future is the word of progress based on a schematic promise to carry out future tense. Solid noun/verb usage, within a made-meant-mean system of label-think, provides failsafe to this burlesque of life, wherein assigned roles can be acted out and manipulated. Result is the word of the agreement process and the failsafe of knowledge is a ticking bomb set upon the human being. Tolerance levels are falsified through stacked intentions with fated assumptions.

      False tolerance levels, to all distortion and bending of the self, are quietly allowed to build and stack one upon the other until no legal parameters can hold such weighty expansion of hypocrisy. Civil disobedience, as a requisite for change, is duly provoked. Pretense gained is far greater than pretense dismissed: hypocrisy is encouraged, even when we do sense and know that, beneath it, there is much more to realize.

      Mankind may materially gain from the enforcement and adherence to such pretense; but at the expense of his own detachment from feeling and, in the long run, our children's children will pay the cost, a price set by those who cement their loyalty to the numbing duty of making life a business. Within this context, business is not the commerce of mutual trade but is manipulation that utilizes grossly unfair group tactics. The group tactics of entity promote a scrub life by allowing for a poor and meager existence at labor's bottom end. Some argue that this is the bottom that is necessary for there to be a top; or, they argue, that those at the bottom must have agreed to be there because, without that agreement, there could be no top or bottom.

      But it is not a natural monetary squeeze that causes such a condition at the bottom. The root cause of top and bottom economic ends is social sanction implicated by group tactics or means to inhibit growth of well-being in favor of progress. Progress advances while well-being is forbidden and denounced. The social vortex begins its pull downward. Top/bottom arrangement forms a blame loop that is made to represent progression from one point to another. A sub-parallel labyrinth is used to simulate forward momentum as a suggestion of time progression. This is a false and humanely devastating tactic that is used to incite fluctuations of inflation and deflation, for the momentum that seals in fated consequence and devotion to unrequited duty.

      The social vortex of group pulls even harder. We assume that future represents a forward aim—a movement toward someplace that is forward of now. The notion that there exists a starting point from which we can, then, move in a straight line to another point, is dubious. There is no place and no time beyond now.

      Improvement sanctions discontent and, yet, discontent is always punished.

      Word use gives us the illusion of movement. We reason that results give us a progressive hold on time. Yet, there is a final time when we cannot escape the fact that awareness is not knowledge and that intelligence is not memory. To insist that knowledge is truth is to insist that we know something valid in order to exercise right over cognition. Our agreement to the validation of truth and right and knowledge is our religion and we sell it to those who can remember it and afford it and carry it, for gain, into blame loop synthesis, the deceptive art.

      Subconscious is a tool to perpetuate paradox. But all that we sell and teach and all that we have been sold and taught is not nearly as fated as what we refuse to admonish by feeling, a priori of life: sensual interrogation and sixth sense reasoning.

      We misconceive feeling as random hindrance and denunciation of reasoned intent. Feeling is human awareness embodied in a single dynamic and rarefied sensation thrown into the physical neural network for doubt; that is the cause of thought and the cause of reason to form: reason, either to gather more information and push feeling into voidance; or to take it deeper, into Valhalla, where we can retrace the logic backward until we reach the calm where natural fear impetus resides, in peace, near the creature. One reason has voice and the other, none necessary.

      In describing will or the act of choosing an I approach to life or a We approach to the tandem standardization of I, another form of I or We begins. That which will always precede I is self, and that which precedes the possible self is feeling: the sensual channels held open to nature and, by nature, for natural inspection and interrogation. I and We imposition is the lead-in to paradox. Will does not exist by or for We pretext nor does volition apply to a random and superficial introspection that could become the subject of We without personification. The embodiment of what could be called will is no more than self-realized connection to place: the mind/body fullness as it reaches to all aspects of feeling, and the recollection of what sensual impact implies and impresses upon memory for information or cross-referencing for a continuing query that is of and about life itself. What is makeshift will is a contrivance bearing manipulated cause and effect through an agreed and certified blame loop: a provoker function good/right theme that provides appropriate schemes and advantages for group manifest authoritarian right and privilege to which one must subscribe in order to succeed. The social, mental vortex of reason is formulated and paradox begins. There is no freedom from its compression and pull.

      In group manifest, there is no such thing as will. Will, in paradox, is manifest We and is both prize and reprisal for the forsaken self. Impasse is imminent; СКАЧАТЬ