.

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ a hope nor its certain malignancy. The R.I.P. is the harsh penalty delivered for failure to live. Future promise pledges better life but it delivers an empty shell: an alien construct placed on the back of the frail being called human, the most gentle creature on earth.

      Our hopelessness called hope shows in our fear and in what we mentally store and must come to draw down and to face. The dually matched justifiers, reason reciprocals, are as phony as the mental parody we use to portray cause and effect and question/answer bias. When these things are made to fit one side or the other, the tear will be mended, even at great cost in suffering.

      Within this study of the R.I.P., we will touch upon certain acts of volition that might suggest human will or resolve, not as impasse nor any contention but a resolve that is without reason as a buttress. Resolve purges "to be or not to be" and purges all interrogation by interrogation. Question does not toy with dualistic justifiers but demolishes them and stops their momentum.

      Man is a multi-dimensional creature in a mono-dimensional suit, clothed in reason and armed with intention in preparedness to defend tradition which is habit for resource and dogma, which is profit by belief.

      It may be assumed that a skeptical man is a non-thinking and non-feeling man. An unrelenting skeptic has a mind that penetrates and probes. He is unwanted and is an unwarranted catalyst who pushes others beyond their usual limited mental states that impede real growth and resist change. The skeptic is too determined and set within a narrow range of categorical dimensions. A skeptic is a harbinger of negativity. His negativity belies hope and undermines promise.

      But it is the skeptic who, by his negativity, is an original thinker: the negative one who asks questions that so disturb the hoax. For this, he pays the price of the outcast.

      The skeptic is, first, an interrogator of self. He seeks out what underlies the vestiges of reason. The skeptic topples reason as the mental sentinel to the passive self that is the vessel for human dignity and grace.

      Dignity is robed in tawdry vestments of truth and is interred in extravagant veils of deception used to justify hard-won seats of authority to acquire. Authority is the generator of blame and is necessary for empowerment of those in mainframe entity. This is manifest paradox with keepers of impasse.

      Entity is comprised of representative think-processors for the masses of people who are not empowered—who are weak in either determination or skill or who prefer to remain blanketed in a false covering of knowledgeable security entrusted to the belief in future promise. Entity encourages non-involvement and non-thought for those who profess belief. This is the reward of belief. Profession of belief is obedience to ignorance. Entity engulfs all aspects of a culture, sweeps past and overtakes anything that could be left to natural human adjustment.

      The human being fails because he is expected to fail and because he agrees to fail. For obedience to duty and for a dubious expectation of redemption from contrived failure, we falsely suffer and distort. We must ask: Is it more desirable to agree to fail or to fail to agree? For what, exactly, do we so despise the skeptic? Is it his freedom that we hate?

      The use of think-process symbols as enactment for empowered truths has an obvious purpose: the advantage over others by commanded use of tradition and archetype. Youth is led to believe that love, favor and duty are cherished, natural elements when, in symbolic meaning, these things are agreement to never question and to receive love as favor of a share-held mindless duty for credence in right and good.

      Deductive thought, the mental domain of the skeptic as empirical observation of what is humanely real, is not taught or practiced. What is taught and practiced are lessons in a made-meant-mean cycle of process-think for absence of thought and occlusion of feeling. The thing that emerges from such teaching is an indistinguishable part of an institutional muscle-brain. Tandem venture within a group structure gives the individual enormous faith in his own converted stealth and cunning. He believes himself fully capable of all cleverness based on reason for group manifest. All pretense to goodness and rightness for reason is laid into a think-housing word compound of what is assumed—and habituated—and what is made-meant to mean—and believed. All that defies belief is placed outside word compound and is held in contempt of reason.

      Vying for position and for the spoils of conquest becomes of utmost importance. Submission for reason is the will to destroy. The R.I.P. is behind us and its shadow enshrouds our vested nature. Our falseness is failsafed and governed by the why of what may be called express lane truths. Blame and excuse justify excision after excision by their authority injustice.

      Impasse is reason to failsafe last reason held, and then impasse is a final thrust for control. Impasse intends blindness for all but focused reason. Last reason is failsafed by why.

      If human beings did not doubt at all, they would be able to assume things at face value. They could assume all truth and goodness and right to be as virtuous as they are touted. However, virtue exists only as manufactured; and it exists in causes set in politics and religion, and these causes are, undoubtedly, correct and true. Keepers of entity stack a subversive deck: one designed exclusively to preserve increments of power.

      Religion fabricates the "don't worry plan" of noninvolvement and safe distance for the promise of salvation and heaven at no cost. Religion does not require self interrogation but promises an easy salvation, as though one may receive a stamp and be passed through the elusive gates of heaven as an empty shell; the more vacated, the better; no effective and working faith necessary; no illumination of self with which to contend. One is expected to serve a dormant self while supporting They induction and symbolic following. One can assume that the world of a blind man can disintegrate around him as long as his other senses are overwhelmed and unable to detect impending harm. We claim to want freedom and to have it: from what do we have freedom? What do we forfeit? Is freedom desirable?

      Incidents occur daily that provide example of paradoxical thinking. Every incidence is cut off from another and from the cause and effect of each. The distance between such instances is filled with the clamoring for why. There is no piecing together of disconnected reason nor any unraveling of intention for the answer to the riddling of why. Humankind tricks itself into submission for reason and the wholeness of self is annulled. This is suicide. This is self-annihilation.

      A minority rules while the majority trails along somewhere between "let's hang on for the ride" and "what are they doing now?" "They" are the holders of system-think logic with think-factory doctrine. "They" are the nay-sayers of what is now and has always been now. How simple it is to discredit the skeptic for his negativity when the positive is, so much, more precisely negative! They become we in subjugated impasse. We all know the uselessness of I.

      Mainstream R.I.P. enters full-blown opposition to all that can be passively sensed. The R.I.P. opposes by intent to distort and divide. Doing matters more than not doing and, in R.I.P., progress and time are the reservoirs for useful work. Faster and faster we move with more of less behind us. We confuse symbolic teetering as momentum, consumption as progress, and duty with well-being.

      It can be argued that action is always better than no action. Is it? Humans forget if given the chance to do so. In remembrance, fears proliferate and emotional wounds cannot heal. Forgetfulness invites rerun reasons and advances the absurd notion that, because one forgets, one does not care. Our assumptions about caring dictate that remembering is far better than forgetting and that doing is far better than not doing. But life is not lived in favor of singular memories and preferred reasons. What have the actions of doing and remembering to do with the deeply striking feeling of devotion to a perfect self that is supremely loving and innately tender?

      Is doing better than not doing? Is promise better than even one audacious step "through the looking glass" of time and remembrance?

      The R.I.P. is applied to all things that are remembered СКАЧАТЬ