Human Language Technology A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ Score

      94. Are stakeholder processes mapped?

      <--- Score

      95. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      96. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      97. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      98. What are the core elements of the Human language technology business case?

      <--- Score

      99. Are the Human language technology requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      100. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      101. When is/was the Human language technology start date?

      <--- Score

      102. Will a Human language technology production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      103. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      104. Who approved the Human language technology scope?

      <--- Score

      105. What Human language technology requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      106. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      107. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      108. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      109. Is Human language technology required?

      <--- Score

      110. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      111. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      112. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

      <--- Score

      113. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      114. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      115. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      116. What are the Human language technology use cases?

      <--- Score

      117. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      118. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      119. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      120. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      121. How do you hand over Human language technology context?

      <--- Score

      122. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      123. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      124. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      125. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      126. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      127. What is the scope of the Human language technology work?

      <--- Score

      128. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      129. Is the Human language technology scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      130. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      131. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      132. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      133. Will team members regularly document their Human language technology work?

      <--- Score

      134. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      135. How do you catch Human language technology definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      136. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      137. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      138. СКАЧАТЬ