Название: Interval Laboratory A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition
Автор: Gerardus Blokdyk
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Зарубежная деловая литература
isbn: 9781867460657
isbn:
<--- Score
74. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
75. Why the need?
<--- Score
76. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
77. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
78. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
79. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
80. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
81. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
82. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
83. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
84. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom Interval Laboratory project?
<--- Score
85. Which information does the Interval Laboratory business case need to include?
<--- Score
86. Who should resolve the Interval Laboratory issues?
<--- Score
87. What situation(s) led to this Interval Laboratory Self Assessment?
<--- Score
88. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
89. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Interval Laboratory delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
90. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?
<--- Score
91. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
92. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
93. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
94. What information do users need?
<--- Score
95. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
96. What would happen if Interval Laboratory weren’t done?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Interval Laboratory Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
2. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
3. How would you define Interval Laboratory leadership?
<--- Score
4. Is there a critical path to deliver Interval Laboratory results?
<--- Score
5. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
6. What was the context?
<--- Score
7. How are consistent Interval Laboratory definitions important?
<--- Score
8. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Interval Laboratory goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
9. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
10. What would be the goal or target for a Interval Laboratory’s improvement team?
<--- Score
11. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Interval Laboratory?
<--- Score
12. Has the Interval Laboratory work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
13. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
14. Do you have a Interval Laboratory success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
15. Are the Interval Laboratory requirements complete?
<--- Score
16. What СКАЧАТЬ