Systems Architecture Service A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Systems Architecture Service Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

      INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. How are costs allocated?

      <--- Score

      2. Has a cost center been established?

      <--- Score

      3. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?

      <--- Score

      4. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?

      <--- Score

      5. Is the solution cost-effective?

      <--- Score

      6. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?

      <--- Score

      7. How do you stay flexible and focused to recognize larger Systems Architecture Service results?

      <--- Score

      8. What causes investor action?

      <--- Score

      9. How sensitive must the Systems Architecture Service strategy be to cost?

      <--- Score

      10. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?

      <--- Score

      11. Is the cost worth the Systems Architecture Service effort ?

      <--- Score

      12. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?

      <--- Score

      13. How do you verify and validate the Systems Architecture Service data?

      <--- Score

      14. How do you verify the Systems Architecture Service requirements quality?

      <--- Score

      15. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?

      <--- Score

      16. Are the Systems Architecture Service benefits worth its costs?

      <--- Score

      17. Which measures and indicators matter?

      <--- Score

      18. At what cost?

      <--- Score

      19. What does verifying compliance entail?

      <--- Score

      20. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?

      <--- Score

      21. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?

      <--- Score

      22. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Systems Architecture Service? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?

      <--- Score

      23. What is your Systems Architecture Service quality cost segregation study?

      <--- Score

      24. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?

      <--- Score

      25. How frequently do you track Systems Architecture Service measures?

      <--- Score

      26. How will effects be measured?

      <--- Score

      27. Does the Systems Architecture Service task fit the client’s priorities?

      <--- Score

      28. What tests verify requirements?

      <--- Score

      29. Are the measurements objective?

      <--- Score

      30. What is the cost of rework?

      <--- Score

      31. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?

      <--- Score

      32. How frequently do you verify your Systems Architecture Service strategy?

      <--- Score

      33. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?

      <--- Score

      34. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?

      <--- Score

      35. How will success or failure be measured?

      <--- Score

      36. What could cause delays in the schedule?

      <--- Score

      37. What are the Systems Architecture Service key cost drivers?

      <--- Score

      38. What are the Systems Architecture Service investment costs?

      <--- Score

      39. What harm might be caused?

      <--- Score

      40. What are hidden Systems Architecture Service quality costs?

      <--- Score

      41. What could cause you to change course?

      <--- Score

      42. СКАЧАТЬ