Field Applications Engineering A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. What could cause you to change course?

      <--- Score

      2. Has a cost center been established?

      <--- Score

      3. What can be used to verify compliance?

      <--- Score

      4. What does losing customers cost your organization?

      <--- Score

      5. Are there measurements based on task performance?

      <--- Score

      6. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?

      <--- Score

      7. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Field applications engineering services/products?

      <--- Score

      8. How will success or failure be measured?

      <--- Score

      9. Do you have an issue in getting priority?

      <--- Score

      10. What evidence is there and what is measured?

      <--- Score

      11. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?

      <--- Score

      12. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?

      <--- Score

      13. Are Field applications engineering vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?

      <--- Score

      14. What are the costs of reform?

      <--- Score

      15. How do you verify and validate the Field applications engineering data?

      <--- Score

      16. How much does it cost?

      <--- Score

      17. What does your operating model cost?

      <--- Score

      18. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?

      <--- Score

      19. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?

      <--- Score

      20. Are there competing Field applications engineering priorities?

      <--- Score

      21. What is the total fixed cost?

      <--- Score

      22. What causes mismanagement?

      <--- Score

      23. How do you measure variability?

      <--- Score

      24. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?

      <--- Score

      25. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?

      <--- Score

      26. What are the strategic priorities for this year?

      <--- Score

      27. What potential environmental factors impact the Field applications engineering effort?

      <--- Score

      28. How will you measure your Field applications engineering effectiveness?

      <--- Score

      29. How do you verify your resources?

      <--- Score

      30. When are costs are incurred?

      <--- Score

      31. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?

      <--- Score

      32. What causes investor action?

      <--- Score

      33. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?

      <--- Score

      34. What is the cause of any Field applications engineering gaps?

      <--- Score

      35. Do you have any cost Field applications engineering limitation requirements?

      <--- Score

      36. Have you made assumptions about the shape of the future, particularly its impact on your customers and competitors?

      <--- Score

      37. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?

      <--- Score

      38. What are hidden Field applications engineering quality costs?

      <--- Score

      39. How will you measure success?

      <--- Score

      40. How are you verifying it?

      <--- Score

      41. What relevant entities could be measured?

      <--- Score

      42. How do you focus on what is right -not who is right?

      <--- Score

      43. What causes extra work or rework?

      <--- Score

      44. Who should receive measurement reports?

      <--- Score

      45. How do you verify the Field applications engineering requirements quality?

      <--- СКАЧАТЬ