Название: Field Applications Engineering A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition
Автор: Gerardus Blokdyk
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Зарубежная деловая литература
isbn: 9781867460213
isbn:
<--- Score
94. Do you all define Field applications engineering in the same way?
<--- Score
95. What are the Field applications engineering tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
96. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Field applications engineering work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
97. What is the scope of the Field applications engineering work?
<--- Score
98. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
99. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
100. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
101. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Field applications engineering results are met?
<--- Score
102. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
103. Has a Field applications engineering requirement not been met?
<--- Score
104. How are consistent Field applications engineering definitions important?
<--- Score
105. Has the Field applications engineering work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
106. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
107. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
108. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
109. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
110. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
111. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
112. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
113. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
114. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
115. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Field applications engineering goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
116. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
117. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
118. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
119. What are (control) requirements for Field applications engineering Information?
<--- Score
120. How do you manage unclear Field applications engineering requirements?
<--- Score
121. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
122. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
123. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
124. Do you have a Field applications engineering success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
125. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
126. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
127. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
128. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
129. Is the Field applications engineering scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
130. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
131. Is Field applications engineering linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
132. How do you manage changes in Field applications engineering requirements?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Field applications engineering Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the СКАЧАТЬ