Название: Home Review A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition
Автор: Gerardus Blokdyk
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Зарубежная деловая литература
isbn: 9781867460695
isbn:
<--- Score
106. Will a Home Review production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
107. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
108. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
109. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
110. How do you catch Home Review definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
111. Is the scope of Home Review defined?
<--- Score
112. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
113. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
114. How will the Home Review team and the group measure complete success of Home Review?
<--- Score
115. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
116. What is the scope of Home Review?
<--- Score
117. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
118. Who is gathering Home Review information?
<--- Score
119. Is Home Review linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
120. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
121. What system do you use for gathering Home Review information?
<--- Score
122. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
123. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
124. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Home Review brings?
<--- Score
125. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
126. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
127. How can the value of Home Review be defined?
<--- Score
128. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
129. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
130. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
131. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
132. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
133. Do you all define Home Review in the same way?
<--- Score
134. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
135. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
136. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Home Review Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Are Home Review vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?
<--- Score
2. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?
<--- Score
3. Are there competing Home Review priorities?
<--- Score
4. How do you verify if Home Review is built right?
<--- Score
5. How is performance measured?
<--- Score
6. What causes extra work or rework?
<--- Score
7. Where is the cost?
<--- Score
8. СКАЧАТЬ