Power System Simulation A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Power System Simulation A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk страница 8

СКАЧАТЬ Score

      99. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      100. How do you catch Power system simulation definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      101. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      102. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      103. What are the Power system simulation use cases?

      <--- Score

      104. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      105. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      106. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      107. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      108. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      109. What is the scope of the Power system simulation work?

      <--- Score

      110. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      111. Who is gathering Power system simulation information?

      <--- Score

      112. Is there a clear Power system simulation case definition?

      <--- Score

      113. How did the Power system simulation manager receive input to the development of a Power system simulation improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      114. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      115. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      116. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      117. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      118. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      119. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      120. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      121. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      122. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      123. How do you gather Power system simulation requirements?

      <--- Score

      124. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      125. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Power system simulation changes?

      <--- Score

      126. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      127. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?

      <--- Score

      128. What happens if Power system simulation’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      129. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      130. What is the definition of Power system simulation excellence?

      <--- Score

      131. Has a Power system simulation requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      132. Is there any additional Power system simulation definition of success?

      <--- Score

      133. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      134. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      135. Are the Power system simulation requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      136. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      137. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Power system simulation work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      138. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      139. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Power system simulation? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      140. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

      <--- Score

      141. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Power system simulation?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided СКАЧАТЬ