Vendor Management Software A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ changed at all during the course of Vendor Management Software? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      97. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      98. What is the scope of the Vendor Management Software work?

      <--- Score

      99. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      100. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      101. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      102. Who approved the Vendor Management Software scope?

      <--- Score

      103. Do you all define Vendor Management Software in the same way?

      <--- Score

      104. Why are you doing Vendor Management Software and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      105. What are the Vendor Management Software use cases?

      <--- Score

      106. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      107. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      108. What is the scope of the Vendor Management Software effort?

      <--- Score

      109. Who are the Vendor Management Software improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      110. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      111. How does the Vendor Management Software manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      112. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      113. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      114. Is there a clear Vendor Management Software case definition?

      <--- Score

      115. Will a Vendor Management Software production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      116. How did the Vendor Management Software manager receive input to the development of a Vendor Management Software improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      117. What would be the goal or target for a Vendor Management Software’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      118. Has the Vendor Management Software work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      119. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      120. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Vendor Management Software work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      121. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      122. How do you manage changes in Vendor Management Software requirements?

      <--- Score

      123. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      124. Are the Vendor Management Software requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      125. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Vendor Management Software changes?

      <--- Score

      126. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      127. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      128. Are accountability and ownership for Vendor Management Software clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      129. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      130. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      131. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      132. Do you have a Vendor Management Software success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      133. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      134. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      135. Are the Vendor Management Software requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      136. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      137. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

СКАЧАТЬ