Master Data Services A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ and validated?

      <--- Score

      24. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Master Data Services?

      <--- Score

      25. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      26. Is there a Master Data Services management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      27. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      28. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      29. Who are the Master Data Services improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      30. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      31. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      32. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      33. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      34. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      35. Are additional no requirements or clarity of requirements necessary?

      <--- Score

      36. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      37. What are requirements for systems?

      <--- Score

      38. Does function perform as designed according to requirements?

      <--- Score

      39. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      40. Is there a critical path to deliver Master Data Services results?

      <--- Score

      41. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      42. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      43. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      44. How do you hand over Master Data Services context?

      <--- Score

      45. How do you manage changes in Master Data Services requirements?

      <--- Score

      46. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      47. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      48. How would you define Master Data Services leadership?

      <--- Score

      49. How much governance is required based on domains and use cases?

      <--- Score

      50. How do you gather Master Data Services requirements?

      <--- Score

      51. Who is gathering Master Data Services information?

      <--- Score

      52. Is Master Data Services currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      53. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      54. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      55. Are accountability and ownership for Master Data Services clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      56. Have all basic functions of Master Data Services been defined?

      <--- Score

      57. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      58. Are customers identified and high impact areas defined?

      <--- Score

      59. What would be the goal or target for a Master Data Services’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      60. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      61. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      62. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      63. What sources do you use to gather information for a Master Data Services study?

      <--- Score

      64. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      65. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      66. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      67. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- СКАЧАТЬ