Master Data Services A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Master Data Services A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk страница 5

СКАЧАТЬ

      71. Who needs budgets?

      <--- Score

      72. Why is services demand a problem?

      <--- Score

      73. What needs to be done?

      <--- Score

      74. How many trainings, in total, are needed?

      <--- Score

      75. Which issues are too important to ignore?

      <--- Score

      76. Where do you need to exercise leadership?

      <--- Score

      77. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?

      <--- Score

      78. How do you recognize an objection?

      <--- Score

      79. What does Master Data Services success mean to the stakeholders?

      <--- Score

      80. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Master Data Services will circumvent those obstacles?

      <--- Score

      81. Do you need to avoid or amend any Master Data Services activities?

      <--- Score

      82. Where is training needed?

      <--- Score

      83. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?

      <--- Score

      84. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?

      <--- Score

      85. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Master Data Services delivery, for example is new software needed?

      <--- Score

      86. What are your needs in relation to Master Data Services skills, labor, equipment, and markets?

      <--- Score

      87. Why the need?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Master Data Services Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

      INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      2. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      3. How will the Master Data Services team and the group measure complete success of Master Data Services?

      <--- Score

      4. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      5. Is budget approved and allocated for the requirements?

      <--- Score

      6. When is/was the Master Data Services start date?

      <--- Score

      7. Is Master Data Services required?

      <--- Score

      8. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      9. Is a fully trained team formed, supported, and committed to work on the Master Data Services improvements?

      <--- Score

      10. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      11. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      12. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      13. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Master Data Services brings?

      <--- Score

      14. Is Master Data Services linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      15. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      16. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      17. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      18. What is the scope of the Master Data Services work?

      <--- Score

      19. What are (control) requirements for Master Data Services Information?

      <--- Score

      20. Is the Master Data Services scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      21. Are team charters developed?

      <--- Score

      22. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      23. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, СКАЧАТЬ