Название: Prayer Book Through the Ages
Автор: William Sydnor
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Зарубежная эзотерическая и религиозная литература
isbn: 9780819224743
isbn:
To the great displeasure of the Genevan party, church music was officially encouraged. The Injunctions of 1559 included this directive for parish churches: “For the comforting of such that delight in music, it may be permitted that in the beginning or in the end of the common prayers, either at morning or at evening, there may be sung an hymn or such-like song to the praise of Almighty God, in the best sort of melody and music that may be conveniently devised, having respect that the sentence of him may be understanded and perceived.”3
John Day published a book of services for four voices in 1565; in several of them the whole of the congregations part is set to music. This was also true of Thomas Tallis’ “Dorian.” It soon became the custom to set only the Kyrie and the creed to music. This may have been because the practice of ending the morning service with Ante-Communion on three Sundays out of four was becoming general. However, the normal Sunday service was thought of as Morning Prayer, Litany, and Holy Communion.
In collegiate chapels and some parish churches there were bequests for the maintenance of a choir. Plainsong was generally used for the canticles and the Psalms. Sometimes, on great festivals, harmonized settings were used. The Injunctions of 1559 made it permissible to sing compositions with English texts; often they were parts of the Collect, Epistle, or Gospel of the day. These acquired the name of “anthem”—a variant of “antiphon.” The organist was permitted to play an organ solo during the offertory at Communion, and short voluntaries were sometimes inserted between the lessons and canticles.
In the age of Elizabeth, edification was the primary aim in worship. Two characteristics of that worship makes this evident. First, this emphasis is reflected in the attitude toward the esthetic. While church music was certainly not ignored during the Elizabethan period, the Church sought to subject it and everything else to the principle of edification. The Creed, the Lord’s Prayer, and the Ten Commandments were set in large letters on the east wall. So it was the basis of Christian faith in words that took the place of images and pictures. Religion was becoming more and more word-centered and intellectual—a matter of reason and reasonableness. Secondly, the tone of worship itself pointed in the direction of edification. It was solemn, impressive, and penitential. Morning Prayer, the Litany, and Ante-Communion were the didactic and penitential preparation for the occasional Holy Communion and for the living of the Christian life.
The reinstituting of Prayer Book order met with little opposition. While there were places where devout congregations continued to flock to the Latin Mass, almost as soon as Elizabeth became queen there were many places where the people “entirely renounced the Mass” and by early January were bringing back the Prayer Book. On Easter, several weeks before the actual Act of Uniformity had passed, the service in the Royal Chapel was Mass “sung in English according to the use of King Edward,” and after it the celebrant took off his vestments and gave Communion in both kinds to the queen and many peers, vested only in a surplice. By Whitsunday (May 14), a number of parish churches and the monks at Westminster made haste to follow suit. St. Paul’s was the only church in London which retained the Latin services up until the last minute.
The actual transition was very quietly accomplished. The resistance of the bishops and principal clergy was both strenuous and solid, but this does not seem to have been the case among the rank and file; most suffered in silence, though certainly many of them deprecated change. In the changeover from the Roman Catholic days of Mary to Elizabeth’s Protestant regime, not more than some 200 clergy were deprived of their livings during the years 1558-1564, a state of things which is in marked contrast with the wholesale policy of deprivation by which the Marian ecclesiastical policy was carried through.
During the forty-five years Elizabeth was on the throne, the Prayer Book was under attack by the Puritans on the left and the Roman Catholics on the right. The Prayer Book was only a part of that religious struggle out of which was forged the genius of what has come to be called “Anglicanism.” And it is that part—the fortunes of the Prayer Book in Elizabethan England—which we now seek to appreciate.
The most persistent and uncompromising attacks on the Prayer Book came from the Puritans. With the Act of Uniformity, the Prayer Book party in Parliament won the day. But the exiles who had come streaming back to England after the death of Queen Mary had hoped to have the 1552 Book as revised and used in Frankfurt. What they got was 1552 revised in the other direction. Their annoyance must have been great when the revision swept away several of the Puritan portions of Edward’s second Book and brought back some of the discarded ceremonies and vestments of earlier times. They were disillusioned by the queen’s conservatism, but this did not keep them from trying by various means to further reform in Convocation, in Parliament, and, if need be, independently. Their two main principles were that nothing is admissible that is not actually found in Scripture; and that nothing tainted with Romanism is admissible, even if it is mentioned in Scripture. Strict observance of these principles ruled out the use of the surplice, wafer bread, the sign of the cross in Baptism, kneeling for Communion, the ring in marriage, the veil in Churching, bowing at the name of Jesus, and the use of organs and “effeminate and over-refined” music. In Baptism, it was in their minds an usurpation of the father’s responsibility that the minister should address the infant and the godparents answer in its name. Other reprehensible practices included emergency Baptism by women, Confirmation, the preaching of sermons at funerals, and, unexpectedly, the reading of the Bible in church. In the first decade there was little criticism of the Prayer Book text beyond what was involved in these practices.
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».