Software AG A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      108. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      109. Is the Software AG scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      110. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      111. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      112. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      113. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      114. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      115. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      116. Who are the Software AG improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      117. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      118. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      119. How do you hand over Software AG context?

      <--- Score

      120. Will team members perform Software AG work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      121. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      122. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Software AG changes?

      <--- Score

      123. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      124. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      125. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      126. What is the scope of the Software AG work?

      <--- Score

      127. What are the Software AG use cases?

      <--- Score

      128. Will team members regularly document their Software AG work?

      <--- Score

      129. How will the Software AG team and the group measure complete success of Software AG?

      <--- Score

      130. Who approved the Software AG scope?

      <--- Score

      131. Will a Software AG production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      132. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      133. Do you have a Software AG success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      134. Are the Software AG requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      135. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      136. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Software AG Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

      INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. How to cause the change?

      <--- Score

      2. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?

      <--- Score

      3. How do your measurements capture actionable Software AG information for use in exceeding your customers expectations and securing your customers engagement?

      <--- Score

      4. Which Software AG impacts are significant?

      <--- Score

      5. Do you have any cost Software AG limitation requirements?

      <--- Score

      6. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?

      <--- Score

      7. How will costs be allocated?

      <--- Score

      8. What are the Software AG investment costs?

      <--- Score

      9. What are your key Software AG organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?

      <--- Score

      10. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?

      <--- СКАЧАТЬ